Most of the comments are, "I want to want to take the train, but I don't."
I'm train by default. This distance is also pretty tractable by our electric car. It's not great by plane.
Most of the comments are, "I want to want to take the train, but I don't."
I'm train by default. This distance is also pretty tractable by our electric car. It's not great by plane.
@jameswynn so, you prefer imaginary trains that are plentiful and fast.
@evan
I definitely prefer trains, but alas there are few to be found in my area and the ones you can find are incredibly slow.
Many people in the US responded that the train system there isn't good, so they wouldn't use it.
I am mixed about the results, as before.
The question doesn't ask about travelling in any particular place, nor about travelling from your home.
I may specify that in the future.
I also find the idea of what your preference would be in counterfactual universes a little hard to grasp.
A lot of the responses said things about how if the train system near them were faster, more frequent, more convenient, etc. they would prefer it.
It is a strange kind of discussion.
We could come up with counterfactuals on any mode of transportation that would eventually make it preferred.
Why would it be worthwhile to talk about preferences for imaginary transportation systems, then?
I think there might be some cognitive dissonance at work.
People are trying to resolve the two conflicting frames "cool people like trains" and "I don't take trains", and the result is expressing a preference for a non-existent ideal train system.
@mcc Is that right?
What does it mean to prefer something that you don't like and don't use?
Are people actually comparing all the aspects on these transportation modes, like price, schedule, door-to-door travel time, comfort, on-time rate, and then choosing a mode that *doesn't* meet their personal priorities?
@evan Maybe part of the problem here is the ambiguity of the word "Preferred". The mode I would prefer to use is not the mode I would typically use in practice.
@brion I don't know. I'm kind of down a rabbit hole here myself.
Like, if you prefer an idealized version of trains that doesn't actually represent how trains work near your home, or even anywhere, what information are we getting out of that?
@evan so preferred should mean what I would prefer or what I would actually take? *More confused than ever*
@evan Well, what I mean
If I say "I prefer to travel by train" then I am clearly stating a preference (a desire).
But if I say "My preferred mode of travel is car", that *implies* it is the desired mode of transportation, but I could imagine interpreting that sentence to idiomatically mean "My customary mode of travel is car" without stating a value preference.
I could be wrong about this, but I think there may be an actual quirk of colloquial English here.
@mcc I think it's like, absent any other factors except the name of the transportation mode, I would prefer trains, but with real-world attributes, I'll make a more nuanced decision.
@evan If I can go by train and it's practical I will. I'd rather never fly. I haven't left New England in 4 years.
@PeteForsyth I'm not requiring anything. I think starting from home is probably how most people can visualise this question.
@evan
Then why are you requiring that we consider train travel in an abstract place, rather than originating from home?
Most trips originate from home, by definition.
@nev Common, yes. Reasonable, no.
@evan i feel you're being intentionally(?) obtuse here. "if the trains in North America were as convenient and efficient as the trains in Europe, I would take the train more" is a very common and reasonable opinion
@evan I think this is easily explained. A lot of people acknowledge deep down that train is the 'correct' answer for sustainability and the environment. The plethora of excuses is simply a justification to themselves of why they actually voted 'Car'.
As for me, well it's obvious. If jetpacks were commercially available at an affordable price with sufficient range and an exemplary safety record - Jetpacks.
@andyc if ifs and buts were candy and nuts
@clacke correct.
@evan I don't think it's so much counterfactual as people thinking "that time I traveled to a civilized country and took a train, it was the best 300 mile trip of my life, but I live in the USA where trains are considered socialist demon vehicles and thus impractical for such a trip"
That being said, I took the Amtrak Pacific Surfliner down the coast of CA once and it was great (although comically, unbelievably slow).
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.