Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Alexandre Oliva (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jan-2023 22:43:02 JST Alexandre Oliva that some recipients shoot the messenger doesn't mean the messenger was unethical, only the recipients. sharing useful information in well-meaning ways is good, whether the recipients will put it to good use or ignore it or get angry at you rather than at the information and their own mistake is up to them -
Embed this notice
Reach for the Stars :verified: (antares@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jan-2023 22:43:03 JST Reach for the Stars :verified: @freemo Also I've tried before when someone left a ZIP+4 visible and I pointed out that I could resolve that number to their apartment building. They blocked me.
-
Embed this notice
Reach for the Stars :verified: (antares@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jan-2023 22:43:04 JST Reach for the Stars :verified: "Hey dude,
I just cyberstalked you and I thought you might want to know.
Sincerely,
An anonymous account you've never heard of before"
-
Embed this notice
🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jan-2023 22:43:05 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 @antares how coukd tellibg them privately in any way be unethical?
-
Embed this notice
Reach for the Stars :verified: (antares@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jan-2023 22:43:07 JST Reach for the Stars :verified: Ethical question: Someone I don't know but share a common interest with posted a picture of a very cool delivery he got with the address blocked out but the tracking number clearly visible. Do I tell him that the shipper gives a partial address online and will give a complete address and photo of the delivered package if contacted by email? or is someone else's OpSec none of my business.
-
Embed this notice