Western women created a clusteryuck world. They invited Islam into US Congress, they destroyed women's sport, they "Vote Blue No Matter Who", they bastardized the Teacher Union beyond recognition, and more, much more of the same.
Oh, and top of it - they think they deserve to be treated "special" in every industry they truly do not belong.
Because "women create a safer, more loving world"...
@djsumdog@arielanimefan@JedDrudge@dever@FourOh-LLC@ademan If someone calls him out wrongly during the show in Locals or YouTube (or Rumble now) he calls them out. And he doesn't shy away from berating women equally. He gets triggered by false accusations.
When he was on Viva/Barnes, he made a very wise statement about how he did take the jab, but no one really knew or could know what the right decision was … something of that nature – essentially admitting he could be wrong but being okay with that.
But then a while later he went off on that crazy rant on one of his viewer’s comments (I think he called her a “Cunt” … and honestly he may have just made up the comment) .. and more recently even Barnes said on the Viva/Barns podcast about how he likes Scott, mentioned how Scott had been on the show, but also talked about how he was going off the rails; pretending he always supported x when he didn’t.
I dunno. I never liked his coffee time show (I don’t like talking heads in general … like the American Vagabond guy is interesting, but I hate listening to his podcast cause it’s just him talking for an hour .. that’s just annoying … same with Carl/Sargon of Akkad way back before he did Lotus Eaters .. having a co-host guest is always better) … and more and more I just dislike some of the amplified rants and triads. I still like the Dilbert toons, but I could give a shit about Adam’s personal views … they’re not well thought out to me and irrelevant.
@djsumdog@arielanimefan @Humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club @JedDrudge@dever@FourOh-LLC@ademan I don't always agree with Scott, but for some reason his point about vaccines doesn't compute with most people. But most people are gullible, dumb, and incapable of changing their mind, so I shouldn't be surprised.
A No Agenda podcaster defending Scott Adams? :agummythink: .. interesting.
It's bad to put anyone on a pedestal. There are things I don't agree with when I listen to John and Adam (and I'm an NA Knight), but I still respect them and learn a lot.
I think there has been a lot of good stuff from Scott Adams, but man he really has been an insufferable asshole for ~2 years or so.
I think it's really healthy and good to always accept criticisms of your heroes, and to not condemn even people you like because of some views you don't agree with. But you still need to be critical. (For example, I typically like Peterson, but he [totally fucked up on his Net-and-Yahoo interview](https://battlepenguin.com/politics/kanye-is-the-ideal-democrat-candidate/#the-net-and-yoo-hoo), and I don't agree with some of his moral idealism, but I also don't hate him just cause he sides with Zionism and the Daily Wire).
People view attacks on those they idolize as attacks on themselves. People need to argue their own ideas, and not just defend a person because of who they are.
Waiting in line is fundamental to a just an free society. Without lines nothing gets done. A functioning society has lines everywhere. The Soviet Union had a ton of lines an they did rly good until capitalism an slavery were able to drown them out by talking their trade an made them collapse ?
You all are completely missing the only conclusions: property managers do not set Public Health policy, and call people names who tell them to get lost.
@dever@ademan Okay, so explain to me how he is wrong? If you were subject to restrictions based on vaccination status, you only remain restricted by remaining unvaccinated. We all made decisions based on incomplete information. He has backtracked on the science bit, since he scientific community has been revealed to be hacks, which many of us suspected.
He's being a retard because all human knowledge is based on limited information. If He's serious, then all thoughts on a subject are just guesses and no one can ever be held accountable for being wrong. It's basically a stoner take. It adds nothing and is a huge cope.
I was clued in when the property manager at my condo called me a murderer for not wearing a mask. This was way back in March, 2021. I saved the entire email tread, this is in writing.
Read that again - the property manager, who's responsibly should be to mind critters and concrete acted as some sort of Health Official, and she was not the only one. While there was no mask mandate yet, nothing. Just an "advisory".
Who needs "scientific facts" after something like this?
Not off hand, but I’d summarize what I’ve seen from him as “people who doubted the covid regime just got lucky that they were right, there was no way they could have known”