@jeffkotuby nah, just something I know about.
It's similar to Harvest Moon/Stardew Valley, but for graveyards. Lol.
I don’t know who needs to hear this, but the Democrats are godawful at messaging because they aggressively ignore anything @georgelakoff talks about.
It’s like a congenital blind spot that the party makes its people accept upon condition of membership.
https://dice.camp/@artemis/112520314141073949
@amerika @djsumdog @ThatCrazyDude @Sirtruckdriver @Zergling_man
After all this time, it was never the metal kids we had to worry about.
It was always the raptards.
It's not the eclipse I'm worried about.
It's if I get the incantation wrong and this happens in the backyard again.
@Gargron while this does not affect myself, it seems a little against what mastodon was about.
It's one thing for unique artwork, but things like posting pictures of objects to describe something will be a pain in the ...
How do we also define AI content? Untouched by a human, 10% to 90% changed by a human after generating?
What next.... Community notes?
Well, the abortion stuff touches upon a thing that i am uncomfortable with with your stance.
As with most of my views it considers the concerns from both sides of the issue, tries to integrate the legitimate ones (according to me) and find a solution that address all the legitimate concerns from both sides. I feel my solution successfully does this, so naturally, it pisses off everyone on both sides of the aisle.
After all, the more unemployed people there are, the bigger the pressure to take unfair jobs.
No you have it backwards. The more unemployed people there are, the less you have to pay a person and still be fair. Afterall if the population is largely unhiarable due to no one bothering to get marketable skills, then that means most people’s labour has very little value and therefore it is fair to pay them a less-than-living wage.
It is the governments responsibility to ensure the proper welfare programs are in place to support the unmarketable laborers, particularly if they bother to issue a minimum wage that is responsible for so many unskilled laborers to be unhirable. And also the governments responsibility to offer the right frameworks to ensure people have the oppertunity to gains kills and rise above the line of marketability.
It is not a companies responsibility to pay anyone a penny more than their natural market value.
You are free of this suspicion, only your stance of “if someone takes a job, then the offer was ok” is posing the problem i am talking about.
It was perfectly ok… but there are many possible places to fix the problem, not the least of which could be that the person accepting the job refused to make the right decisions (took a bad offer, he could have maybe gotten a better one if he shopped around). So yes it is always fair but only so far as that it is fair to the choices both parties made, if people had acted more skillfully then there may have been a better outcome
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.