@aramba I think, generative AI actually *is* an autocorrect. But now it's no longer spelling and grammar, but your imagination that is corrects towards the expected.
It feels like big tech has basically given up and has retreated to indulging in escapist fantasies: space colonization, blockchain, AGI, the network state, metaverse, "hacking death", etc.
None of this solves any problems, or, even works as advertised.
@adoranten I think from a point of view of a history of ideas, longtermism is, indeed, a “vacuous intellectual movement”. But this is missing the point, ideas never become hegemonic by their internal sophistication or coherence. They become hegemonic because they serve a purpose, to provide meaning, foreground problems that can be solved and push into the background those that cannot (ie. climate change is down-graded to existential risk, i.e. only a problem is wipes out the technological infrastructure).
They are, in a way, an organic expression of power as much as a resource to power.
The world would probably be a better place if the absolute amount of computing power would no longer grow. Then development would have to focus on making things more efficient rather than relying on brute force everywhere.
Narrow (domain specific) #AI is powerful, broadly applicable, and potentially socially beneficial.
Broad AI (domain agnostic), like most generative AIs, in contrast, do have very few actual use cases (i.e. applications sustainable without VC subsidies) and is by and large socially harmful.
It's probably a case of confirmation bias, but I had to impulse-buy this (comic) book on how the many ways in which the vision of space colonization makes no practical sense. After reading @pluralistic 's review:
Went to see a superblock in Barcelona. Given how much they feature as urbanism of the future, they are amazingly simple. Take an intersection, block traffic in all four directions and you have a square. Plant trees, add some tables and benches. That's basically it. Replace cars with trees and don't privatize the resulting space. All you need, and all that is usually missing, is political will.
"First, AI is not a technical term of art, it is a marketing term that has been applied to a hodgepodge of data-centric techniques. Second, the sudden shift to AI in the early 2010s had everything to do with tech industry consolidation and the resources at the heart of the surveillance business model. We see this clearly when we recognize that what was new about AI in the early 2010s was not new innovations in machine learning indeed the methods that were applied to prove ai's Newfound utility date from the 1980s.
What was new were the significant amounts of available data used to train AI models and the power of the computational infrastructure available to conduct this training and calibration, resources concentrated in the hands of a few private tech companies care of the surveillance business model.
So if we look at it from this perspective we see that AI's primary role has been to expand what can be done with the massive amounts of surveillance data collected and stored by large tech firms. By sprinkling the magic and marketing of AI surveillance data could be used to create models of reality which are then applied far beyond surveillance advertising to make predictions and determinations across nearly every realm of human life from transportation to education to medicine to confidently offering the wrong answer in response to a prompt and so on.
And, it's worth noting that this too produces intimate data it may not be by direct surveillance but it still has power over us, it still shapes our lives, and it still shapes our profiles. So, in short, the marketing narrative of AI mystified, entrenched, and expanded the surveillance business model at the heart of the tech industry."
Während viel über ein mögliches Engagement öffentlich-rechtlicher Medien im Fediverse diskutiert wird, sind die Potenziale von Fediverse-Instanzen von Hochschulen bislang kaum Thema. Dabei wäre es höchste Zeit, dass sich gerade Hochschulen ins Fediverse begeben. Ein Aufruf von @leonido
Researcher, teacher, and activist at the intersection of culture, technology, and politics. Born at 324 PPM. Binary, so you don't have to be.If you are on this instance, I won't follow you because I'll read all your posts in the local timeline. Why, because I want to get a sense of place as I'm currently one of the moderators of this instance.