Coal Fired Computers (2010)
Somebody should update this project for the age of hyper-scalers!
Coal Fired Computers (2010)
Somebody should update this project for the age of hyper-scalers!
A "Post-American Internet" is on the horizon, because crises precipitate change, says @pluralistic .
Let's make sure it will be not be Chinese but that the Fediverse is part of it.
I'm fascinated by this image. Meta's planned 5GW Hyperion Data Center overlaid on Manhattan to demonstrate its size.
If you ever needed an image of how digital colonialism looks at home, here it is. And, remember, Zuckerberg published it himself. Btw, 5 GW requires 5 dedicated nuclear power plants (probably more if you factor in redundancy).
https://www.threads.com/@zuck/post/DMF6tMAxkX8?xmt=AQF0I6-Ctn0leigUTf6ExxSz9KzG2zhB17D-AQ5kfFzBZQ
@rasmusfleischer great station. Tx for sharing it!
"Think of it. Forty-five hundred years ago, if you were a Sumerian scribe, while your calculations on the world's first abacus might have been laborious, you could be assured they'd be correct. Four hundred years ago, if you were palling around with William Oughtred, his new slide rule may have been a bit intimidating at first, but you could know its output was correct. In the 1980s, you could have bought the cheapest, shittiest Casio-knockoff calculator you could find, and used it exclusively, for every day of the rest of your life, and never once would it give anything but a correct answer. You could use it today!
But now we have Microsoft apparently determining that "unpredictability" was something that some number of its customers wanted in their calculators."
This is probably the most devastating thing you can say about Zuckerberg's push for "superintelligence"! Talk about reframing the narrative. Master class.
Oh yeah, fast track model collapse!
For me, this is the best image symbolizing what Gen AI actually is. A black box, burning the planet, understood best, paradoxically, through technological means.
What you see here is a thermal image of xAI's Datacenter in Memphis, where 33 methane power generators are burning without permission.
Photograph: Steve Jones/Flight by Southwings for Southern Environmental Law Center.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/apr/24/elon-musk-xai-memphis
Ex- Googler Eric Schmidt on the energy demands of the AI industry. "Many people project demand for our industry will go from 3 percent to 99 percent of total generation. ... We need the energy in all forms, renewable, non-renewable, whatever. It needs to be there, and it needs to be there quickly."
99% of all available energy! They really have given up on people (well, except their own offspring, of which there cannot be enough.)
If this isn't a death cult, I don't know what is one.
https://futurism.com/google-ceo-congress-electricity-ai-superintelligence
Bringing Quote Posts to Mastodon
Our approach to this long-requested feature
https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2025/02/bringing-quote-posts-to-mastodon/
DOGE Is Hacking America
"It’s as if someone found a way to rob Fort Knox by simply declaring that the new official policy is to fire all the guards and allow unescorted visits to the vault."
With AI being pushed into government by fascists, we need an updated analysis of the "The Banality of Automated Evil". Because this is what is happening. The evasion of responsibility for inhuman actions through formal procedure.
A message from Ubu!
UbuWeb
Founded 1996
February 1, 2025
A year ago, we decided to shutter UbuWeb. Not really shutter it, per se, but instead to consider it complete. After nearly 30 years, it felt right. But now, with the political changes in America and elsewhere around the world, we have decided to restart our archiving and regrow Ubu. In a moment when our collective memory is being systematically eradicated, archiving reemerges as a strong form of resistance, a way of preserving crucial, subversive, and marginalized forms of expression. We encourage you to do the same. All rivers lead to the same ocean: find your form of resistance, no matter how small, and go hard. It's now or never. Together we can prevent the annihilation of the memory of the world.
@bureaux @timnitGebru There difference is pretty clear to me. A search engine provides a connection between the person seeking information/content and the person providing it. Once that connection is established, the search engine gets out of the way.
GenAI, on the other hand, separates the person seeking from the person providing by taking the latter's information and reorganizing it as their own.
Rather than making a connection, it isolates the two parties from one another, capturing all the value for itself.
via @obliquestions
@rasmusfleischer I hope that's not AI slob!
@EubieDrew or boots only the first post in the thread and the rest can be easily accessed through the threading.
2/ One is digitization, where market forces created extreme concentrations of wealth and power while threatening everyone else with redundancy (most recently even artists, long presented as neoliberal role models). It destroyed the public sphere (a problematic construct to begin with), replacing it with a system of chaotic volatility.
The other is climate change, where the weakened state has been unable to overcome the resistance of fossil fuel interests. Instead of strong policies, “market incentives” were used, which made life under stagnating wages even harder, while having no impact on the structural dependencies. Hence, the clean energy build-out did not reduce the amount of carbon emissions. That might change in the medium term, simply for economic efficiency reasons, but likely too little, too late. All of this made a mockery of expertise and rationality, which acknowledged the problem while coming up with a long list of reasons why not to act on it. Against this background, the argument that climate change is not a big deal because we can fix it later once AI has delivered a miracle solution is at least internally consistent.
While Trump and the far right are, well, fascists in a political science sense, their support is not because people became fascists (though some have always been, and it has become OK to say so openly). As Brian Holmes has argued for a long time now, the popularity of the far right is better seen as a Polanyian double movement, people turning to fascism as a way of seeking protection against the ravages of unconstrained capitalism (Trump’s two main points: lower prices and closed borders).
1/ What a time to be alive!
In the US, Trump is re-elected, and in Europe, governments are collapsing (Germany), teetering on the edge of collapse (France), heading toward a last-ditch centrist coalition that nobody believes in (Austria), or have already flipped to the far-right (Hungary, Slovakia, Italy, Netherlands).
It’s clear the liberal world order has collapsed and will not recover—not only at the periphery, where it was always fragile and embroiled in wars (hence the easy alignment of Harris and Cheney), but also at the center. At the periphery, which no longer accepts the status of periphery and has become present in many forms in the center, few will shed tears—except the Ukrainians and, possibly, the Taiwanese. The pious bromides about human rights and a rules-based order can no longer provide justification and soft power, with the genocide in Gaza the final nail in the coffin.
At the center, the order collapsed because of its own contradictions. Though there are many, they manifest themselves in different ways, but I think they boil down to the neoliberal state being unable to manage two really deep transformations.
3/ It’s quite striking that in seven out of ten states, abortion protection measures won with strong popular support. Even in Florida, 57% of voters backed the measure (but it failed to reach the 60% threshold required for adoption). It’s quite telling that, when considered in isolation, the key point of Harris’s campaign was widely supported, but the overall project of the continuation of the liberal order was rejected.
The left has been completely unprepared for this collapse. Fifty years of neoliberalism have undermined ideas and practices of solidarity and replaced them with a cynical, game-theory view of social interaction as endless competition in zero-sum games. On what new basis solidarity could be rebuilt is entirely unclear to me.
We are off the charts now, and many vulnerable people will suffer. There is a tidal wave of ugliness coming. While liberal wars might be pursued less vigorously now that the Cheneys are in the wilderness for good, neocolonial exploitation will not, creating its own incentives for war. Musk made this very clear in relation to the need to have access to cheap lithium.
But there is no reason to be nostalgic. It’s precisely the charts we had that created the mess we are in.
Researcher, teacher, and activist at the confluence of culture, technology, and politics. Binary, so you don't have to be. Born at 324 PPM.If you are on this instance, I won't follow you because I'll read all your posts in the local timeline. Why? Because I want to get a sense of place as I'm currently one of the moderators of this instance, and I wish to recover some of the collective dimensions of social media (rather than simply individual social graphs intersecting).
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.