@mike_hales Conversations for action can be (and often are) conducted purely by humans, or even more often via email or chat messages. It's a protocol (in the sense of a set of rules for engagement) that can be followed in many ways. If an economic engagement between people and their organizations fits that frame, it will most like use some variation on conversations for action.
@mike_hales That all makes sense to me but is more complicated than we will do it. I'm looking for a document describing the combination of conversational and formatted economic statements that we have in mind, but my new computer can't access it yet, so after breakfast.... @ckohtala@lynnfoster@band
This is a new thread about the human relationships coordinating resource flows in economic networks.
One angle I have observed, back from my work for Choreology around 2000 (this is one of the few signs that it ever existed: http://xml.coverpages.org/CohesionsV10-Announce.html ) is that coordinated networks of all kinds seem to need a coordinator. Somebody who responds to all participants in a decision thread leading to consensus.
And to finish that last thought for now, the coordinator role could be very temporary. Could be re-assigned in the midst of a decision thread, if need be. But there was always a coordinator who asked all of the other participants if they agreed or not and announced the decision (or failure to decide).
One network we have been working with lately is https://www.newyorktextilelab.com/ in the Hudson River valley between New York state and New England. Laura Sansone seen down that page is the coordinator of the network. She and her partner Evan drove around in their pickup hauling wool, yarn, and knitted and woven textiles around the valley from one stage in the textile flows to another.
The main roles in the network are farmer, wool cleaner, spinner, weaver or knitter, and the garment designer (who is usually the coordinator of all the other processes).
Laura wants to get the other textile designers to coordinate their own flows.
We're helping them to coordinate a software development team to help all that textile coordination to work.
@mike_hales I'm not in any hurry with this topic. I started by responding to you and then thought maybe I could take it into another dimension.
Do you think you might have time and interest for such a discussion at some more relaxed time, and could you ping me whenever? Or do you think this whole topic is not so compelling for you?
Either way is ok with me.
(I assume Bill is @band ? Do you two know each other?) @lynnfoster
@mike_hales I re-skimmed some of the Cybersyn material and would like to look next at your criticisms. Have you put them into one or a few places that I could read? I have https://owncube.cloud/index.php/s/YjsepZKafAsjoLt but it would help to know where to focus.
I understand the class criticism, and agree that the "model of the brain" is not a good model for human social-economic organization.
Maybe we could have an interesting discussion if we focus on something that we might both want to do that might overlap some with, or glance off of, Cybersym.
Or maybe Cybersyn is not worth discussing anymore...
In my next toot, I'll suggest a somewhat related problem that we might have some fun with. Or not.
Old, very old...in the background of my avatar, you can see the exact middle of nowhere where I grew up. #maskwearer(I had copied some political slogans from fedi campaigns I supported. I still support them, but the slogans may have lost their context, so I deleted them. May add more as they appeal to me. In general, I am anti-capitalist, pro-woke, and think Fedi can help organize a better economic system.)