Notices by Victor Venema (victorvenema@fediscience.org)

@gerald_leppert

My impression is that AcademiaEdu is focused on collaborative research. Another set of functions that could be interesting for such a social network. https://delightful.club/delightful-open-science/#collaborative-research

Then it can become a large job; although, also here, there is already a lot there. 2/2

@tio @futureisfoss @humanetech @mpjgregoire @socrates

@gerald_leppert Yes, citations would also be good. My preference would be a federated system. I did not know whether your question was about the future or present.

I do not know Friendica well, but I would prefer @bonfire over Mastodon. Mastodon is nearly impossible to extend, while Bonfire is more like a library.

Is GoogleScholar more than a search engine and Scholia? I had not seen it as a social network. 1/2

@tio @futureisfoss @humanetech @mpjgregoire @socrates

@humanetech Maybe it is my field of study, but my impression is that there are more scientists on ResearchGate than on Twitter.

Mastodon can do anything Twitter can. The difference is the number of people there, which is really important for science as it is so highly specialized. So you need a large group to at least have some people to talk to.

Climate scientists probably prefer Twitter because that is were the journalists and misinformation is.

@mpjgregoire @gerald_leppert @socrates

Carbon Offsets (Last Week Tonight) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p8zAbFKpW0

John Oliver explains why I have never ever bought a carbon offset. When fake offsets "compensate" real CO2 emissions they make matters worse.