@snickerbockers I totally shared your skepticism until fairly recently. I’m now mentally lumping it with self-driving cars. It’s not better than the experts (yet?), but to be useful it only has to be better than the noobs.
@froge@snickerbockers I don’t inherently disagree. This isn’t me arguing so much as talking through it with some friendly voices. But I’ve been playing with some nice stuff and it’s a whole awful lot better than it was even 6 months ago. A year? Leagues apart. It got me through some sticky code today quite efficiently, much more than I could’ve been on my own. Yes, it surely makes goofy mistakes, but also made some excellent targeted suggestions.
I’m currently watching an AI reason its way through fixing some code, and its thought process is eerily human: “Let’s try a thing. Did it work? No, same error. Let’s do this instead. Hmm, different error. This approach isn’t working. Let’s try a new idea.”
@Sheep_Overboard Oh, wild. I haven’t knowingly used an AI support agent before, but it cannot possibly be worse than Comcast’s human help center today.
How California sent residents’ personal health data to LinkedIn – The Markup:
"As visitors filled out forms on the website, trackers on the same pages told LinkedIn their answers to questions about whether they were blind, pregnant, or used a high number of prescription medications."
I let Tek Jr pick out today’s Strange Cheese from the grocery store, as is our tradition, and they selected what turned out to be mild cheddar and habanero. My mouth is on fire. We’re going back for more.
I know I don't have a lot of US military friends here, but there are a few. Remember that the oath of enlistment starts:
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;"
Before and above all, our allegiance is to the Constitution, not to any individuals. If our orders are un-Constitutional, they are illegal, and shall not, *must not* be obeyed.
This is utterly despicable. “Scientists” perform human research on unconsenting persons, and reported that they successfully persuaded some people to change their views by lying to them with AIs.
Did they contact all those people later to explain that they’d been lied to? Or are they still wandering around with their changed opinions, persuading their friends, and voting?
Politics ∪ tech ∪ security ∪ privacy ∪ O_oOne-time EFF Tech Trivia champion.Sysop of Free Radical.I blog about this at https://blog.freeradical.zone/.I’ve got your back.Very approachable. Bring treats.