@authen @mia i can't be bothered to think of one but there's some sort of insult here about your writing being so terrible that it takes a genius to figure out what the hell you're trying to say... something about just because it's difficult to understand doesn't mean it provides any useful insight, like jordan peterson
Notices by Archiolgy (admin@mastodon.number251.duckdns.org)
-
Embed this notice
Archiolgy (admin@mastodon.number251.duckdns.org)'s status on Thursday, 19-Dec-2024 08:39:52 JST Archiolgy
-
Embed this notice
Archiolgy (admin@mastodon.number251.duckdns.org)'s status on Friday, 05-Apr-2024 20:12:50 JST Archiolgy
@freemo @lowqualityfacts The employees... make the goods and services? they make the stuff and sell the stuff; they do all the work, that's why they should get the profits. Anyway, this ultimately comes down to whether or not you think exploitation of labor is immoral, and obviously you don't, so there's no point in me arguing with you over this.
-
Embed this notice
Archiolgy (admin@mastodon.number251.duckdns.org)'s status on Friday, 05-Apr-2024 14:30:15 JST Archiolgy
@freemo @lowqualityfacts
The maths on that doesn't add (or rather divide) up to me. You're saying that 50,000,000 divided by 1,500,000 is less than 0.01?
Firing the CEO would give the workers about 33 dollars a year; still not very much. Comparing the profits of the company to the wages should paint a better picture. With a net profit of $383 billion in 2023, that would be enough to pay the 1.5 million people over $250,000 per year. And the shareholders do even less than the CEO.