GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by Scott M. Stolz (scott@authorship.studio), page 2

  1. Embed this notice
    Scott M. Stolz (scott@authorship.studio)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 05:02:25 JST Scott M. Stolz Scott M. Stolz
    I have been following and participating in discussions related to the ActivityPub / AT Protocol bridge (also known as the One-Sided Mastodon vs. Bluesky Grudge Match).

    There are some interesting observations:

    • Many people don't feel that their fediverse software has the tools they need to prevent harassment or spam.
    • Many people feel they need to depend on moderators to protect them, and don't feel empowered or able to protect themselves.
    • A lot of people didn't really understand what they signed up for, and become shocked and angry when they find out how federation and the fediverse-in-general actually works. Many people did not even realize that they are connected to other platforms and protocols already.
    • Some people don't seem to understand what public means, and that if their post is public, anyone can see it, including people they don't want to see it. They don't seem to realize that privacy by obscurity is not true privacy.
    • Some people are willing to stereotype millions of people as being bad just because they are on the wrong platform.
    • Some people are willing to collectively punish (i.e. block) millions of people, because they don't like one person involved in the project.
    • Some people are extremely hateful and will resort to insults and threats to try to get what they want.
    • A large chunk of Mastodon (and other parts of the fediverse) will wall itself off from the rest of the fediverse, for a variety of reasons, some valid, some not-so-valid.
    • Some people actually hope they wall themselves off, since there seems to be a lot of hostility towards "outsiders" coming from them.
    • There is a huge demand for fediverse software that has better privacy, access control, and moderation tools.
    • The existing fediverse software that has these advanced tools are not widely know.
    • Bluesky users don't seem to care whether there is a bridge or not, and are amused at the reaction going on over on Mastodon.
    In conversation about a year ago from authorship.studio permalink
  2. Embed this notice
    Scott M. Stolz (scott@authorship.studio)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Feb-2024 13:05:38 JST Scott M. Stolz Scott M. Stolz
    in reply to
    I think a lot of people think that Mastodon is the fediverse, and then freak out when they find out that it is actually connected to all of these other things too. I am guessing no one told them what federation is and how it works.
    In conversation about a year ago from authorship.studio permalink
  3. Embed this notice
    Scott M. Stolz (scott@authorship.studio)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Feb-2024 12:42:34 JST Scott M. Stolz Scott M. Stolz
    in reply to
    • Allen
    @Allen
    The point we’re trying to make is this should be OptIn BECAUSE it’s created by a private entity, that’s all. It’s not an outrageous take.
    Out of the over 46,000 independently operated servers on the fediverse, how many are run by private entities? I don't know but I am guessing that it is more than 1.

    At least with Bluesky and Threads, it is easy to block. But I am guessing that it would be nearly impossible to figure out which of the 46,000 ActivityPub-enabled servers are commercial and which are not.

    And Threads will be connecting to ActivityPub natively. And so will WordPress. Both will bring in millions of users.

    I respect people's choice to block whomever they want, but the ActivityPub part of the fediverse already has commercial servers in it. Bluesky would just be one more, which you are free to block.
    In conversation about a year ago from authorship.studio permalink
  4. Embed this notice
    Scott M. Stolz (scott@authorship.studio)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Feb-2024 18:43:39 JST Scott M. Stolz Scott M. Stolz
    in reply to
    Nomadic identity, where your identity is not tied to an individual server, and can exist on multiple servers at the same time, is also a way to protect your social identity.

    Would FEP-ef61 support nomadic identity similar to how it is implemented in Hubzilla (Zot protocol) and Streams (Nomad protocol)?
    In conversation about a year ago from authorship.studio permalink
  5. Embed this notice
    Scott M. Stolz (scott@authorship.studio)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2024 07:40:37 JST Scott M. Stolz Scott M. Stolz
    in reply to
    Are you talking about making sure that an incoming message is not corrupted, or are you talking about making sure the sender is who they say they are, or both?
    In conversation about a year ago from authorship.studio permalink
  6. Embed this notice
    Scott M. Stolz (scott@authorship.studio)'s status on Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 00:49:27 JST Scott M. Stolz Scott M. Stolz
    in reply to
    What a minute. I thought we had to worry about Embrace-Extend-Extinguish from major corporations. It sounds like Mastodon is using that strategy themselves.
    In conversation Sunday, 07-Jan-2024 00:49:27 JST from authorship.studio permalink
  • After

User actions

    Scott M. Stolz

    Scott M. Stolz

    I am an entrepreneur, small business owner, author, and researcher. I am also working on an open source project called Neuhub.I am posting from Hubzilla with Neuhub via ActivityPub.

    Tags
    • (None)

    Following 0

      Followers 0

        Groups 0

          Statistics

          User ID
          229961
          Member since
          6 Jan 2024
          Notices
          26
          Daily average
          0

          Feeds

          • Atom
          • Help
          • About
          • FAQ
          • TOS
          • Privacy
          • Source
          • Version
          • Contact

          GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

          Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.