Sigh.
No, colleague, PR review does *not* mean I will rewrite all your janky GPT-generated code so it actually works.
Sigh.
No, colleague, PR review does *not* mean I will rewrite all your janky GPT-generated code so it actually works.
@eaton I’m not doing anything too special at the moment. I had reasonably accurate results with a GPT model in some manual testing, so I wrote a little Go code to iterate through a directory (a git repo) on my file system and ask an Ollama model to classify the code files based on my taxonomy. I tried the newish Ollama code-reasoning model, qwen2.5-coder, and it is - less accurate at the classification task than GPT. Trying to decide if I should tweak my prompt or try out some different models.
Oh no. I may have accidentally found a task that an LLM is suitable for.
We have come up with what we think is a reasonable classification system for the code examples in our docs.
We have ~27,000 things that *might* be code examples.
My brain is down the rabbit hole of figuring out how to get an LLM to apply our rubric to classify our code examples.
So far, early testing = acceptable accuracy. So no need to manually audit 27,000 examples, hopefully!
This has been… a very tough week.
I haven’t been so glad for a Friday in a LONG time.
Grr.
Trying to have a convo about a GraphQL API that I use. Both spousey and I are unhappy with docs, and a person who *writes* those docs was asking for feedback.
Someone in the comment thread said: “If you don't understand [foo] then you probably aren't the intended audience.”
First, I never said I don't understand foo.
Second, I am a person who needs to use the API, therefore by definition I am the intended audience!
What an unnecessary elitist gatekeeping comment. So frustrating.
I am having a spicy take on a post I just saw by a CTO who is promoting his company’s structured content something-or-other.
“New” = not enough docs/community info to adopt, may not have proven product-market fit and could be a completely different product in 6-12 months, possibly buggy, MVP version very lacking in functionality.
“Blazingly fast” = here is a business reason to rationalize your purchase. Save time = save money. Also, fast as a PoC, maybe not at scale, or with full feature set.
Iconfactory envisioning a universal timeline for all the things you care about?
Yes, plz, I am 1000% in.
Project Tapestry
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/iconfactory/project-tapestry
Writer and coder. Loves gardening, dogs, coffee, and overland travel. Programmer writer jamming on docs at MongoDB by day, indie dev by night. Currently enjoying my tractor way too much.#technicalwriter #iOSDev #macOSDev #coffee #dungeonsanddragons
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.