@AnthonyJK@julieofthespirits@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes well I want to qualify when you say "Blacc Christian" you have to be saying blacc evangelicals. Because Yt people didn't invent shit, not even Christianity, and there were Blacc Christians before the concept of "White People" was ever a thing
@AnthonyJK@julieofthespirits@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes But ultimately that's my point, liberalism seeks assimilation as a means to effecting genocide, and its versatile and has been rather successful in doing so - while not actually, disagreeing with conservatives on the main point of maintaining a colonial capitalist world order.
@AnthonyJK@julieofthespirits@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes as witnessed by liberal policy in US denying healthcare & being pro-pig, anti-blacc, being anti-trans, and in Africa by conservatives who have imported via evangelical (again white/colonizer) Christianity a hate for *wait for it* blacc queer and trans people.
And note how mum liberal policy makers are about evangelicals wielding money and power over neocolonial regimes. Aren't they supposed to be the defenders of LGBTQIA2S+ people? Nah 2/2
The need to control blacc people's familial realtions today is borne out as reactionaries would have blacc folks via (white/colonizer) Christianity and by utilizing the sexualized brutality visited upon us, turn against blacc queer & trans people saying they're anathema to blaccmess & claiming to want "strong blacc families"
In 2024 liberals and conservatives can say 'strong blacc families" and mean the same thing, 1/
@AnthonyJK@julieofthespirits@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes I'm referring to the history of welfare requiring "men who could work" to not be in the home, lest the family not be able to receive benefits, policy that was implemented during the Johnson Admin.
The family "unity" colonizers want for colonized peoples comes necessarily with the stripping of any ability of said family to be a source of its own liberation. Time & theory & practice of the oppressor dictate what kind of "family" we can have.
@julieofthespirits@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes liberalism does actually think too much immigration is bad, it does see the need to "control" it because they can concede being unable to stop class consciousness and collaboration between the colonized working class and white workers against the colonial ruling class is an existential threat liberals and conservatives share.
The libs are just trying to hold on with all they can so the slow death can run its course, and they fear the guillotine 5/5
@julieofthespirits I feel like this gets to the utility of the liberal tendency within bourgeois democracy, that is to survive long enough to achieve its desired out come of total colonial genocide, by its preferred means of assiminlationism.
When pressured from the left and heads roll it appeases via more robust social safety nets, which largely serve the purpose of ameliorating misery, and liberalism compelled capital in the imperial core countries 1/
@julieofthespirits@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes to comply at home to "lift 'all' boats" while exporting the bloodiest work out of sight (and hopefully out of mind) while never giving an inch on the underlying presumption that the white nation should rule (via colonial capitalism) its cultural impositions should control & shape who the entire world should be, and who among the oppressed is palatable, even to represent opposition against it
All while attempting to break said opposition clandestinely 2/
@julieofthespirits when it no longer feels the pressure that is has to improve conditions or fall from socialist powers, liberalism has to survive its conservative, eliminationist counterpart taking control, that is - the people who they agree with in their end goal (colonial domination & genocide) but who would do so via means that would likely upend the system completely - and risk anticolonial (necessarily socialist if its to pose any actual threat) revolution. 4/5
@julieofthespirits@AnarchoNinaAnalyzes and in that way (e.g. welfare being used as a means to break up blacc families, residential schools, using CPS to steal colonized children from their families, COINTELPRO, mass-incarceration ) limiting the very concept of life without the yoke of colonialism, and the same time limiting the ability of colonized peoples reproduce (practically and socially) for our own benefit. 3/
Fascism is not a mode of production, Colonialism is. Musk wants fascism for the imperial core because he, Thiel, and a bunch of those shit heads see it as the means to maintain a colonial capitalist mode of production.
Im hearing that libs are going around calling people who wont support genocidal maniacs running for office are "single issue voters"
Libs: please understand that you're actually telling people you are willing to turn away while a genocide happens, and that both enables genocide and makes you functionally no different than Zionists, and other right-wing reactionaries
Also that's what socialists and communists (like myself) and at least some anarchists have been saying about yall for ≈ 200 yrs?
Give money to mutual aid not Kamala damn Harris, and don't blame mutual aid networks for not having as effective a fundraising strategy as the mfkin Democratic Party
Because you've never seen an unskippable youtube ad for Food Not Bombs,
Because your local bail fund doesn't have actblue of VAN access
What in the goddamned fucc is wrong with yall.
Yes I'm subtooting, because if you @ people you're a "reply guy".
he/himlong term hiatus from 1P1P1D at blacktwitter.ioAfrican Internationalist, not a Pan-Africanist plz look it up if you're unsure (or ask) my politics only make sense if you understand that.No patience for Liberalism, Libs DNIDeath to America, Neighborhood to yo grandkids#UnderNoPretextI'm not the Tolerant Left.#KoupeTetBouleKai#FromTheRiverToTheSea26+6=1#nobot #nosearch #noindex #AuDHD #NoBridgeLizzy's in a box, IN A BOX! Lizzy's in a BOOXXAyo if you don't fucc w TBS idfwy