that part of the video explains very clearly how having a "contained" fascist on the mod team is still part of an effective recruitment strategy, and why the way mike (the instance owner) is acting now is a sign that the strategy is working.
but i REALLY think you should watch the whole video, because it explains not just what communities with "no politics"-style policies does for the alt-right (the "no controversy" kind that gets you a warning for saying trans lives matters), but also the rest of the alt-right radicalisation pipeline that those communities are part of.
ok, since I'm seemingly not really doing anything useful today, I'll use my own words to state something from that video. (so i'm not the smart person behind this; that's ian danskin/innuendo studios, self-identified cis guy)
when there's a "no politics" policy, what does that really mean?
well, "politics" actually means controversy here. "don't talk politics" really means "don't cause political conflict". ian points out how "nazis are bad" is an uncontroversial opinion and therefore also non-political. but therefore, "nazis are good" is also non-political, since nobody will defend it! it's obviously a joke. it doesn't cause conflict within the group because everyone disagrees.
"trans lives matter" DOES on the other hand cause controversy within the group, so it is considered political and yields a warning. (yes, on fosstodon)
what this means is that being a nazi is considered non-political and allowed, while being trans is on the other hand considered political, so you better not talk about it—and if you do, then you are ruining the community with your political agenda.
now, it's worth pointing out that fosstodon doesn't actually have a literal "no politics" rule. instead, it has a "don't cause political conflicts" rule—and that's the exact thing that "no politics" usually means. look, they made it super obvious that the above is what is going on:
3) Do not be intentionally antagonistic. A post or reply designed to provoke a confrontation is not acceptable.
i think that usually, blocking and then posting about it means that the block was intended as a form of public moral judgement. i do those too sometimes when reply-guy randoms show up from nowhere and dump huge loads of anger in my mentions. it's a decent way of processing it (and i usually do need to process it), at least for as long as it's "punching upwards"
the "not naming names" public shaming thing is something I've talked about before, like when admins quote incoming reports and argue about them publicly. it's a thing i saw a lot of in politics too, a kind of master suppression technique building on oneself having more informal and often also formal power than the other, meant to intimidate others from disagreeing with you. "look what happens if you talk back to me"
but anyway, i hardly ever post about blocking someone when it's for my own mental health, which is like… nearly all of my blocks so far. why would i draw attention to wanting to avoid all contact with someone? that could cause drama and draw their attention, which is what i'm trying to avoid, right?
some people still notice and get upset by being quietly blocked and start subtooting about it, in much the same manner as those who are blocking others as a power play
and here's something that will probably seem alien to a lot of people: it's always such a relief when that subtooting begins!
it's one of my most problematic flaws that i'm so intensely afraid of accidentally making someone feel rejected for no good reason, and that includes them feeling rejected by them blocking me. no i'm not kidding. this is what i was shaped into. it's the core trait that "made me" into a repeat relationship abuse victim, for example. i "make" people with invasive tendencies become uniquely abusive, by not setting the boundaries they need. so this is not about me being "too nice" at all. and i'm likely never going to fully get rid of this dependent personality style no matter what i do. i just have to learn how to deal with it
so i'm happy to have come this far now that when the subtooting begins, it dispels all those toxic feelings of me somehow causing needless harm: this really wasn't someone i should have been in contact with in the first place. to phrase it in the least ableist way i can think of: we're ultimately incompatible
i need to put way more trust in my "kelpian" sixth sense
@hipsterelectron I understand. but look, I think the thing described (the failure to predict risks of rejection) actually should count as part of RSD, since it's defined as sensitivity to being rejected even if it's just imagined (as is what is happening when we cannot predict that it won't happen)
and furthermore, I think this is related to the brain's reward system and dopa levels. when our brains are trying to predict the outcomes of our plans for social actions (even simple ones like saying hello) the "win" condition is detected by the dopa-driven reward system. but in many ADHDers (majority) this fails
when I got medicated, this whole problem (which was huge, a situational mutism that had cost me so so much) went away in just an hour. one small pill and it was gone
rejection sensitive dysphoria is supposedly a thing for ADHDers particularly. but I have found that I'm a lot more sensitive to rejecting than to being rejected. ultimately I'm okay with being rejected (a lie) since I kind of always expect it anyways (a truth)
okay okay, I admit it, it is hard. (although still easier than accepting help.)
but to reject someone—oh gosh that's a hundred times worse than anything else. I have literally spent years alone just to avoid it
My pre-transition self feels kind of like a brother I didn't really like. Now he's gone and I have to deal with all his stuff. I kind of wanna just throw it all away, but at the same time, like… he's still my brother, right? And there is lots of stuff in there that the rest of the family would appreciate so much, like photos and texts etc.
Idk, now I'm kinda angry at him for just leaving like that, forcing me to deal with this mess he left behind. Selfish prick.
It's so useless being poly when you're also non-partnering and non-sexing. Relationship anarchy almost seems kinda pointless too for a label. Maybe I should adopt something else, like… I mean it's just me at my level, right? Nobody else. So maybe "relationship monarchy" haha
big envelope with lots of paperwork to fill in from the gender cops at the gic. if i manage to quantify my gender dysphoria correctly, they'll put me on the waiting list for an assessment. I've waited more than three years for this, for having them decide whether i should have waited or not.
the waiting list for an assessment is currently 9–12 months and growing. the assessment is 7 months long but they've hidden 2–3 years of waiting there so that the public won't find out, making it 3 years long at best. and then the waiting times for HRT etc is 1+ years.
one of the things I'm supposed to do now in these forms is to describe what's currently affecting my mental health negatively. and WELL SINCE YOU'RE ASKING
how happy are you with your body? grade each body part from 1 (very satisfied) to 5 (very dissatisfied)
nose shoulders hips chin lower legs breasts hands adam's apple vagina/scrotum height thighs arms eyebrows clitoris/penis waist muscles butt facial hair face weight biceps uterus/ovaries/testicles head hair voice feet body shape body hair chest movement patterns appearance
for each one that you've answered 3–5, indicate whether you want to surgically and/or medically change it or not