@killyourfm
Neither camera will produce exactly what your eye would perceive. Human eyes can (typically) resolve more detail than any camera, along with a greater dynamic range and more finely detailed colour gradients. There are always going to be compromises translating a scene to a digital screen or print.
The more consequential difference in my mind is that a phone provides the user with very limited ability to contribute to these compromises. You're going to get lots of saturation, heavy sharpening, HDR by default. Changing this, beyond applying one of a small number of preset 'filters' quickly becomes awkward.
The Canon, on the other hand, encourages you to engage with every decision point: exposure, aperture, white balance, depth of field. Once you get the file onto your computer you have limitless control to further alter your image.
The result may be more or less 'realistic' than the phone. But whatever you do with it, the product is a result of your agency as an artist, not default settings installed in the equipment.
(of course there are exceptions and edge cases, nothing is absolute!)