@lina Those who engage in "sealioning,"* or who otherwise act as trolls, get blocked.
As for my interests, those include computer science, linguistics, financial market trading, Chess, math, theoretical physics, political and ethical philosophy, Constitutional law and libertarian politics.
So, either engage in legitimate discourse, or get thyself blocked. Your choice.
* Sealioning is a trolling or harassment tactic in online discussions and blogs. It involves the attacker asking relentless and insincere questions or requests for evidence under the guise of civility and a desire for genuine debate. These requests are often tangential or previously addressed, and the attacker maintains a pretense of civility and sincerity, while feigning ignorance of the subject matter. Sealioning is aimed at exhausting the patience and goodwill of the target, making them appear unreasonable.
FTA: “…These excess deaths are undeniable…certain governments are now changing how they calculate these numbers…the ONS just announced they changed its calculation methodology for the excess deaths numbers which reduce the excess deaths because they like that result better…
These deaths are undeniable… You can't hide the dead bodies.
…One America CEO Scott Davison, in a chamber of commerce meeting, revealed that he had seen 40% excess mortality ... for 25 through 64. He said that a 10% increase would be once in a 200-year-flood or three standard deviation event. 40% was off the charts…”
You only try to censor or sanction that which you can't effectively "debunk," and that you know will adversely affect your false narratives more than trivially.
This government program is using funds stolen from taxpayers under threat of imprisonment in order to import a massive amount of new residents into Blue states in order to increase the Electoral College votes and Congressional delegation size of those states. And that's just assuming that these new foreign residents will never vote.
@SAUNDERS Yes: Per the DNC rules, if the nominee resigns, becomes incapacitated or dies, the DNC can just select a candidate to take the place of the original nominee.
Newsom would almost certainly be the choice. Even so, forcing them to do it that way damages their chances more than having Biden impeached, given that the Senate will not vote to convict.
@SAUNDERS Of course the opposition will make an argument. I've heard every one of them, and they're absolute GARBAGE. Laughably so.
Read Federalist #84, then research who wrote it, and that person's opinions on the proper authority of the US government under the Constitution, and how the Federalist papers were used to get the Constitution ratified.
After having done that, if you want to make an argument against what I've said is the proper way to interpret the Constitution, then do so. I'll respond to it.