@SecureWaffle@GossiTheDog They _must_ do that if they want to sell Windows in Europe, where they have a requirement that third-parties get the same access as their own security products do.
This is healthy in a way: if the kernel & Defender teams work out what it'd take for the latter to run in user space, I'd bet that MVP API would cover most other users with minimal additions since they all care about the same kinds of activities.
“this month marks the fiftieth anniversary of a core piece of free software technology that would quickly become a seminal piece of collaborative software, the bedrock under every version control system and arguably the single most important piece of social software ever created.
@inthehands Ah, yeah, that's what I get for leaving the reply window open while I got lunch. Sorry about the redundancy but I'm glad to see more attention to the root cause vs. just ragging on HR.
@inthehands This is going to get so much worse with outsourced services job descriptions banks and, especially, LLMs to give false confidence that the listing, screen questions, etc. are okay because they have fewer glaring errors. The obvious grammatical or technical errors were embarrassments but they did at least give readers a cue that there wasn't a skilled reviewer in the loop at that stage. Now ever penny-pincher is going to think they can pay HR even less because the tools do the work.
@marick I think Diamond has held up better – I haven’t seen accusations of the outright misrepresentation in service of right-wing tropes which characterizes Haidt’s big books - but I think you’re right to reconsider contrarianism. It’s such an easy path to a rush of self-satisfaction that I think it almost inevitably leads to errors over time as the writer relaxes their self-doubt – Nate Silver used to be a better writer when he had to worry about what an editor would say, too.
Probably the most important lesson from that $50k scam story is that thanks to decades of lax businesses being breached, scammers have most of our private data and use it to sound legitimate.
@apodoxus@vaurora a softer form of this is confirmation bias: I’m objectively a smart person, doing well on this test was important to my career & most of my peers’, therefore it must be measuring something real.
I used to support neuroscientists & one thing they’d remind everyone of is that humans are notoriously prone to believing we’re being rational when we’re constructing a story that explains the present.
Software developer at a big library(Note: if you followed @acdha@twitter.com this account is more related to my work interests and @acdha is more personal)