SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Oct-2024 19:14:34 JST

@funbaker@chaos.social Oh yeah especially the section "Analysis of Stallman’s published comments" that contains a supposed table where they count Stallman's statements and his retractions.

It is obviously unfair to count the amount of retractions against the amount of statements relating to a certain topic.

Expecting a retraction for every single individual statement that you consider problematic is unreasonable. I bet Stallman himself doesn't remember the exact thing he said 20+ years ago on some random mailing list.

If someone makes a retraction on a single topic you should assume that all the other related statements to the same topic are to be considered retracted as well.

I might go as far and say that the way they present this table is done so maliciously.