@teratology@the.asbestos.cafe @p@freespeechextremist.com
Can I really say this?
I would measure the kolmogorov complexity of the base hardware (like bios or uefi)
Not exactly, since you can't. But an upper bound, whch is "easy" to do
Then I would prepare some code with a higher kolmogorov somewhere else. another installation. On a breadboard. Pen and paper if necessary
The new code would have a higher kolmogorov complexity than the one in the base hardware. There's nothing the base hardware could do, since it can't physically grow (it can try to lie to you about its kolmogorov complexity and this is the next step of the cat-and-mouse game. So far, it doesn't because nobody had this idea I'm taling about, go read the literature if you doubt it)
So the new code would act as a kolmogorov barrier. It would use the hardware without allowing it access to the actual information.
Well, in theory. Of course.
I don't have access to 3 months of rent, which is the time I would reasonably need to attempt this.
And pen and paper.
Amanda (amanda@pleroma.thezone.host)'s status on Saturday, 25-Nov-2023 04:24:19 JST
-
Embed this notice
Amanda (amanda@pleroma.thezone.host)'s status on Saturday, 25-Nov-2023 04:24:19 JST Amanda