fiatjaf (3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d@mostr.pub)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Mar-2023 05:50:57 JST
-
Embed this notice
I see. That was the initial design of NIP-26 before we switched to having different keys for backwards-compatibility. But your point makes sense. We might be able to come up with a magic cryptography trick that does that.
It would break backwards-compatibility, but, well, NIP-26, the way it is being pushed, also breaks backwards-compatibility, so we might as well do something better than NIP-26 for the purposes.