@John_Darksoul >reads it
>says he will not read it
What did he mean by this?

>renewable energy is sold at a discount just to remain competitive. I imagine if it wasn’t subsidized it wouldn‘t even be attempted.
>My assumption is that the issues and costs associated with nuclear power are priced into the cost of the electricity it produces [implying it is cheaper anyway]
>I’ve been extremely consistent.
I think I've heard enough.

>You have a rosy view of solar that does not hold up to the reality of pricing. That is my point. You are wrong.
and yet you have given barely any argument to back this up, whereas I did, proving the opposite.