Embed Notice

@rootfake @aiono @MikeDunnAuthor

So when I said you should bother to understand a persons viewpoint before making statements you just double down...

You said:

> the exact ideology you're espousing. It grew out of the "if you don't work, you don't eat" shit

And yet despite your claim it is the "exact ideology you're espousing" My own words explicitly say the exact opposite of that. My own words at multiple times. For example my exact words (in a response I tagged you) was:

> The next step is to ensure people have access to high quality welfare programs that 1) keep them fed and healthy in the interim

Funny that, the exact **opposite** your claiming my stance is.

Again, before you start slinging accusations or judgements bother reading the basics of a conversation first, otherwise your just wasting everyones time with faux offense over fantasies of arguments I never made.