Eh Eye Ate Dub Yah ✡︎ :ally:I am still trying to understand and grasp the mentality: "I am angry about the actions of X, so I should be allowed to destroy the property of Y and Z." where Y and Z have little to nothing to do with X.
Example 1: "I am angry about Musk and Doge, so I should be allowed to destroy the cars owned by Tom, Dick, and Harriett."
Example 2: "I am angry about Palestine, so I should be allowed to destroy the library at Columbia University."
How does this make any sense? Could someone explain it?
If the musk haters were destroying musk's personal vehicles, I could see my way to understanding at least part of it, but destroying the private property of someone who bought a Tesla? Wrong target.
...unless I'm missing something?
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the