@sunmcnukes

> Not a State.

they organized themselves as a society with leadership and rules

> You can't choose when.

Often enough you can. When you get diagnosed with cancer, you can choose to follow what your oncologist says or to let your body die on its own clock. You can choose to eat or not. You might even be able to choose to starve yourself of water. You can choose to go outside and die of exposure. You can slit your wrists. You can signup for MAID or throw yourself off of a cliff. When and how you check out is one of if not the most important choice you'll ever make.

Sometimes you don't get to choose so much -- getting hit by an israeli rocket isn't something people actively choose. But people *do* have some choice in whether or not they try to get the fuck out dodge when bad things happen, though sometimes that's a hard call (die of exposure trying to get the fuck out of dodge or die of whatever is going to kill you there).

> Survival is the goal, death is purpose.

death isn't the only purpose and sure as fuck isn't mine

> Your food died for you to stay alive.

it did - otherwise *i would be the food rather than the person eating it*.

>Monarchy relies on a State too but your socialist heros rewrote History in such a way that they funneled all physical and spiritual

there's no such thing as 'spirits'
i think this is why you're so confused
there is no such thing as a 'spiritual' resource

>States are unnatural, death isn't.

Exactly. We avoid death through States.

> Back to topic: why should I care about people dying because of bureaucrats?

If you don't care at all that thousands of innocent children are dying from preventable causes that's a flaw on your part.

> Do you want to help those people?

Part of helping people is when people get into trouble to connecting them with people who can help them. If that's not you then carry on to another thread, you are not needed here.

> You don't need the State to donate your possessions.

'donating my possessions' isn't the only way to help people.