Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://noauthority.social/users/realcaseyrollins/statuses/114320201925995618">casey is remote (realcaseyrollins@noauthority.social)'s status on Saturday, 12-Apr-2025 02:25:08 JST</a><a href="https://noauthority.social/@realcaseyrollins" title="realcaseyrollins@noauthority.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/232741-48-20240116143709.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="casey is remote" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">casey is remote</a><div><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/252764" title="lnxw37b2@shitposter.world">Another Linux Walt Alt</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://qoto.org/@freemo">@freemo</a> <a href="https://shitposter.world/users/lnxw37b2">@lnxw37b2</a> Ah, I like that response better than this thread.</p><p>The one thing I'd add to that is that in a digital age it's very easy to manufacture consensus, all you need are some bots. So something can *seem* popular online, but that consensus could be either faked or manipulated (for example, biased admins could remove dissent and have the same effect as botted consensus).</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4879653#notice-9557307">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-04-12T02:25:08+09:00" title="Saturday, 12-Apr-2025 02:25:08 JST">about 16 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://noauthority.social/@realcaseyrollins/114320201925995618" rel="external" title="Sent from noauthority.social via ActivityPub">noauthority.social</a></span></span><a href="https://noauthority.social/@realcaseyrollins/114320201925995618">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
casey is remote (realcaseyrollins@noauthority.social)'s status on Saturday, 12-Apr-2025 02:25:08 JSTcasey is remote
- 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
- Another Linux Walt Alt
@freemo @lnxw37b2 Ah, I like that response better than this thread.
The one thing I'd add to that is that in a digital age it's very easy to manufacture consensus, all you need are some bots. So something can *seem* popular online, but that consensus could be either faked or manipulated (for example, biased admins could remove dissent and have the same effect as botted consensus).
In conversationabout 16 days ago from noauthority.socialpermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice