Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/lisrosello/statuses/114138527680966673">Elisabet Roselló (lisrosello@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 04-Apr-2025 21:32:49 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@lisrosello" title="lisrosello@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/287316-48-20241016091624.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Elisabet Roselló" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Elisabet Roselló</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@lisrosello/114138513944860234" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>¿Y en dónde Jameson menciona la frase? O más importante, ¿en qué contexto dice que "Nos es más fácil imaginar el fin del mundo que el fin del capitalismo"?</p><p>Una de las primeras referencias, por gentileza de un hilo en Reddit donde se han encargado de acopiar info sobre tal pesquisa, es en un artículo titulado "Future City" de 2003, donde dice lo que aparece en esta captura de pantalla </p><p><a href="https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii21/articles/fredric-jameson-future-city" rel="nofollow">https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii21/articles/fredric-jameson-future-city</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4844152#notice-9487014">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-04-04T21:32:49+09:00" title="Friday, 04-Apr-2025 21:32:49 JST">about 2 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@lisrosello/114138527680966673" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@lisrosello/114138527680966673">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4413880">For it is the end of the world that is in question here; and that could be exhilarating if apocalypse were the only way of imagining that world’s disappearance (whether we have to do here with the bang or the whimper is not the interesting question). It is the old world that deserves the bile and the satire, this new one is merely its own self-effacement, and its slippage into what Dick called kipple or gubble, what LeGuin once described as the buildings ‘melting. They were getting soggy and shaky, like jello left out in the sun. The corners had already run down the sides, leaving great creamy smears.’ Someone once said that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than to imagine the end of capitalism. We can now revise that and witness the attempt to imagine capitalism by way of imagining the end of the world.</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/114/138/525/697/087/559/original/bbc9c30478ef6120.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/114/138/525/697/087/559/original/bbc9c30478ef6120.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: newleftreview.org</div><h5><a href="https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii21/articles/fredric-jameson-future-city">Fredric Jameson, Future City, NLR 21, May–June 2003</a></h5><div> from <span>@newleftreview</span></div></header><div>After the dilapidation of urban modernism, what kinds of city and what forms of architecture await us? The author of The Seeds of Time considers their flowers in the dizzying work of Rem Koolhaas, the mega-developments of the Pearl River Delta and the conceptualization of ‘Junkspace’. Breaking back into history with a battering-ram of the postmodern?</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Elisabet Roselló (lisrosello@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 04-Apr-2025 21:32:49 JST Elisabet Roselló
in reply to
¿Y en dónde Jameson menciona la frase? O más importante, ¿en qué contexto dice que "Nos es más fácil imaginar el fin del mundo que el fin del capitalismo"?
Una de las primeras referencias, por gentileza de un hilo en Reddit donde se han encargado de acopiar info sobre tal pesquisa, es en un artículo titulado "Future City" de 2003, donde dice lo que aparece en esta captura de pantalla
https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii21/articles/fredric-jameson-future-city
In conversationabout 2 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. For it is the end of the world that is in question here; and that could be exhilarating if apocalypse were the only way of imagining that world’s disappearance (whether we have to do here with the bang or the whimper is not the interesting question). It is the old world that deserves the bile and the satire, this new one is merely its own self-effacement, and its slippage into what Dick called kipple or gubble, what LeGuin once described as the buildings ‘melting. They were getting soggy and shaky, like jello left out in the sun. The corners had already run down the sides, leaving great creamy smears.’ Someone once said that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than to imagine the end of capitalism. We can now revise that and witness the attempt to imagine capitalism by way of imagining the end of the world.
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/114/138/525/697/087/559/original/bbc9c30478ef6120.png
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: newleftreview.org
  Fredric Jameson, Future City, NLR 21, May–June 2003
  from @newleftreview
  After the dilapidation of urban modernism, what kinds of city and what forms of architecture await us? The author of The Seeds of Time considers their flowers in the dizzying work of Rem Koolhaas, the mega-developments of the Pearl River Delta and the conceptualization of ‘Junkspace’. Breaking back into history with a battering-ram of the postmodern?

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice