Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fluffytail.org/objects/9d4f56de-5b1c-4bec-adaa-d01339fc91a4">Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Monday, 31-Mar-2025 17:23:56 JST</a><a href="https://fluffytail.org/users/phnt" title="phnt@fluffytail.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/158739-48-20230808204705.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Phantasm" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Phantasm</a><div><a href="https://wolfgirl.bar/objects/a0e29849-eb81-4042-bf6c-c066aef45f4a" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><a href="https://wolfgirl.bar/users/wan">@wan</a> Even Brother isn't safe now, it's just the lesser evil.<br><br><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/</a><br><a href="https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Brother_ink_lockout_%26_quality_sabotage#cite_note-ars-response-7">https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Brother_ink_lockout_%26_quality_sabotage#cite_note-ars-response-7</a></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4817671#notice-9442031">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-03-31T17:23:56+09:00" title="Monday, 31-Mar-2025 17:23:56 JST">about 3 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fluffytail.org/objects/9d4f56de-5b1c-4bec-adaa-d01339fc91a4" rel="external" title="Sent from fluffytail.org via ActivityPub">fluffytail.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fluffytail.org/objects/9d4f56de-5b1c-4bec-adaa-d01339fc91a4">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.arstechnica.net</div><h5><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/">Brother denies using firmware updates to brick printers with third-party ink</a></h5><div></div></header><div>Brother: Updates aren’t behind degradation of quality or removal of features.</div><footer></footer></article></li><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Brother_ink_lockout_%26_quality_sabotage#cite_note-ars-response-7">Brother ink lockout &amp; quality sabotage - Consumer_Action_Taskforce</a></h5><div></div></header><div></div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Monday, 31-Mar-2025 17:23:56 JSTPhantasm
in reply to
- 獣耳会社ｗａｎ
@wan Even Brother isn't safe now, it's just the lesser evil.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/
https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/Brother_ink_lockout_%26_quality_sabotage#cite_note-ars-response-7
In conversationabout 3 days ago from fluffytail.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.arstechnica.net
  Brother denies using firmware updates to brick printers with third-party ink
  Brother: Updates aren’t behind degradation of quality or removal of features.
2. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Brother ink lockout & quality sabotage - Consumer_Action_Taskforce

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice