Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://gultsch.social/users/daniel/statuses/114246744432259747">Daniel Gultsch (daniel@gultsch.social)'s status on Sunday, 30-Mar-2025 02:16:25 JST</a><a href="https://gultsch.social/@daniel" title="daniel@gultsch.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/15317-48-20221031194039.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Daniel Gultsch" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Daniel Gultsch</a><div><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/175590" title="jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io">Jenniferplusplus</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@jenniferplusplus">@jenniferplusplus</a> <a href="https://toot.fedilab.app/@apps">@apps</a> personally I belive it's fine to assume https as the transport. While ActivityPub may or may not work over telnet I don't think we'd be using a web+ scheme for that.</p><p>However - assuming that we can agree on https - my question was just: is it<br>a) web+activitypub:something<br>b) web+activitypub://something</p><p>The examples in the FEP indicate a although there isn't any normative text.</p><p>The web+soup example here <a href="https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#custom-handlers" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#custom-handlers</a> also uses variant (a)</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4813263#notice-9428060">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-03-30T02:16:25+09:00" title="Sunday, 30-Mar-2025 02:16:25 JST">about 2 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gultsch.social/@daniel/114246744432259747" rel="external" title="Sent from gultsch.social via ActivityPub">gultsch.social</a></span></span><a href="https://gultsch.social/@daniel/114246744432259747">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: html.spec.whatwg.org</div><h5><a href="https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#custom-handlers">HTML Standard</a></h5><div></div></header><div></div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Daniel Gultsch (daniel@gultsch.social)'s status on Sunday, 30-Mar-2025 02:16:25 JSTDaniel Gultsch
- Fedilab Apps
- Jenniferplusplus
@jenniferplusplus @apps personally I belive it's fine to assume https as the transport. While ActivityPub may or may not work over telnet I don't think we'd be using a web+ scheme for that.
However - assuming that we can agree on https - my question was just: is it
a) web+activitypub:something
b) web+activitypub://something
The examples in the FEP indicate a although there isn't any normative text.
The web+soup example here https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#custom-handlers also uses variant (a)
In conversationabout 2 months ago from gultsch.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: html.spec.whatwg.org
  HTML Standard

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice