Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://freesoftwareextremist.com/objects/bed4c44f-8c19-4adc-b44f-7767b89fb46a">翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 13-Mar-2025 20:56:13 JST</a><a href="https://freesoftwareextremist.com/users/Suiseiseki" title="suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/789-48-20220724040913.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="翠星石" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">翠星石</a><div><a href="https://shitposter.world/objects/573ad8c7-2ec1-47c0-9d35-4b22db10dbd4" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/253319" title="thatbrickster@shitposter.world">Bricky</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/333262" title="dick@cawfee.club">atma–jnani</a></li></ul></div></section><article><a href="https://shitposter.world/users/thatbrickster">@thatbrickster</a> <a href="https://cawfee.club/users/dick">@dick</a> <a href="https://shitposter.world/users/mangeurdenuage">@mangeurdenuage</a> &gt;If I had a horse in this race, it's Apache<br>There is Apache 1.1 and Apache 2.0.<br><br>Apache 2.0 is GPLv3-compatible (but not GPLv2-compatible).<br><br>&gt;It doesn't have restrictive terms (GPL) <br>Please actually read any GNU license.<br><br>Why don't you try to find a restriction in the GPLv3 for me? (spoiler: there are no restrictions, just no grant of power in certain cases); <a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html">https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html</a></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4724469#notice-9251820">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-03-13T20:56:13+09:00" title="Thursday, 13-Mar-2025 20:56:13 JST">about 21 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://freesoftwareextremist.com/objects/bed4c44f-8c19-4adc-b44f-7767b89fb46a" rel="external" title="Sent from freesoftwareextremist.com via ActivityPub">freesoftwareextremist.com</a></span></span><a href="https://freesoftwareextremist.com/objects/bed4c44f-8c19-4adc-b44f-7767b89fb46a">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.gnu.org</div><h5><a href="https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html">The GNU General Public License v3.0 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</a></h5><div> from <span>mailto:webmasters@gnu.org</span></div></header><div></div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 13-Mar-2025 20:56:13 JST翠星石
in reply to
@thatbrickster @dick @mangeurdenuage >If I had a horse in this race, it's Apache
There is Apache 1.1 and Apache 2.0.

Apache 2.0 is GPLv3-compatible (but not GPLv2-compatible).

>It doesn't have restrictive terms (GPL)
Please actually read any GNU license.

Why don't you try to find a restriction in the GPLv3 for me? (spoiler: there are no restrictions, just no grant of power in certain cases); https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html
In conversationabout 21 days ago from freesoftwareextremist.compermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.gnu.org
  The GNU General Public License v3.0 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
  from mailto:webmasters@gnu.org