so you run trojans from two malicious web sites to "prove" that another web site is not malicious. that's as reasonable as asking both coca-cola and pepsi whether their softdrinks are healthy to drink. they don't seem to be affecting only browsers, but also users' brains 😞

that it makes the site completely inaccessible to, per your own numbers, 2.31% of browsers, where web standards recommend graceful degradation instead of big bold red letters stating "don't feel welcome" to those with specific accessibility needs that both major brands of browsers can't tend to, is a big "screw you" to me and others

that it renders computers unusable to access this very site, computers whose manufacturers have abandoned, by refusing to patch known security vulnerabilities that can be exercised with remotely-supplied javascript and refusing to allow owners to patch them by themselves, computers that would still be perfectly usable to visit web sites that actually took the trouble to abide by web standards instead of jumping on the "you must enable javascript" "screw you" mindless bandwagon, adds insult to injury, and more litter to the pile

that a web site that ought to be as security conscious as it goes, and reports vulnerabilities even on browsers, that enable web sites to induce remote execution of arbitrary code on visitors' computers, demands visitors to open up their computers to such risks is not only contradictory to its mission, it's a "screw you" to security education as well.

CC: @Suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com