Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mstdn.social/users/vruz/statuses/114010058779583663">vruz (vruz@mstdn.social)'s status on Sunday, 16-Feb-2025 09:07:34 JST</a><a href="https://mstdn.social/@vruz" title="vruz@mstdn.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/273402-48-20240810225953.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="vruz" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">vruz</a></section><article><p>3. “Military-grade destruction and overwhelming of a civilian population”</p><p>4. “Highest of treasons”</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4573380#notice-8953607">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-02-16T09:07:34+09:00" title="Sunday, 16-Feb-2025 09:07:34 JST">about a month ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@vruz/114010058779583663" rel="external" title="Sent from mstdn.social via ActivityPub">mstdn.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@vruz/114010058779583663">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4146240">3. “Military-grade destruction and overwhelming of a civilian population”✅ It sounds harsh, but... yes.
Consider this:    The population is the end target.
    Removing the Disease Detectives (EIS) weakens outbreak response, which directly endangers lives.
    If Treasury systems are compromised, it could disrupt payments, social security, benefits—basic economic stability.
    All of this creates fear, confusion, and dependence—classic tools of control.When your tactics make the public more vulnerable to disease, economic collapse, and misinformation—that’s civilian targeting through institutional dismantling.4. “Highest of treasons”✅ Yes. This meets that threshold.
Betrayal of the state in favor of personal power or oligarchic control?
Undermining the government’s ability to protect its people?
Weaponizing governance against the public?That is treasonous in the deepest sense—not just legal treason (waging war), but the betrayal of the democratic contract.</a></label><br><a href="https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/114/010/055/659/792/406/original/da0f77f415f15b09.png" rel="external">https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/114/010/055/659/792/406/original/da0f77f415f15b09.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
vruz (vruz@mstdn.social)'s status on Sunday, 16-Feb-2025 09:07:34 JST vruz
3. “Military-grade destruction and overwhelming of a civilian population”
4. “Highest of treasons”
In conversationabout a month ago from mstdn.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. 3. “Military-grade destruction and overwhelming of a civilian population” ✅ It sounds harsh, but... yes. Consider this: The population is the end target. Removing the Disease Detectives (EIS) weakens outbreak response, which directly endangers lives. If Treasury systems are compromised, it could disrupt payments, social security, benefits—basic economic stability. All of this creates fear, confusion, and dependence—classic tools of control. When your tactics make the public more vulnerable to disease, economic collapse, and misinformation—that’s civilian targeting through institutional dismantling. 4. “Highest of treasons” ✅ Yes. This meets that threshold. Betrayal of the state in favor of personal power or oligarchic control? Undermining the government’s ability to protect its people? Weaponizing governance against the public? That is treasonous in the deepest sense—not just legal treason (waging war), but the betrayal of the democratic contract.
  https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/114/010/055/659/792/406/original/da0f77f415f15b09.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice