@josemanuel Yeah, what do you do? I figured it'd be disappointing when the bottom was visible but I was curious what the bottom actually was, because sometimes there's something weird.

I think it's a mistake for the git repo hosts to also serve as web hosts, like Github does, where if you set up a repo a certain way, you get a subdomain and it's a website. The repo hasn't been touched in a year and is basically set up to be used in internet arguments and someone just hosting code doesn't have the problem.