@Jens_Rasmussen >army navy
The main point is they are smarter than we are so they would obviously be better at picking the correct option. Why would they be split 50/50 if one is obviously worse?
The second point is they are more virtuous so they would not quarrel over equally good choices. Why would they block national security over petty preference?

If you think it's not possible:
Think about what is required from the voting base to have a republic*, and what archaic forms of rule you'd need if the population deteriorated genetically. Look at what happened to Rome. Look at what's happening to us.
Extrapolate in the other direction.

If you just think it's not inevitable, that's fair enough, the Chinese would probably cook up some horrid hivemind aberration in their lab if they were the first to succeed.

>"I would never hurt a gamer, but a cyclist I would run over if it was permitted."
You forgot to attach the gigachad image.

>assuming you can somehow direct what a person considers their "in-group" to be racial
This is very possible genetically. Many animals including humans exhibit such a trait.

>There is for example a strong tradition for celebrating mythical warriors in Germanic peoples, yet this has not been done for generations. How can this be? Has the Germanic genetics disappeared?
It has diminished. Dysgenics.



*Side Note: I am not defending democracy or republics in general here. Democracy is gay and flawed.