@PhoenixSerenity @ireneista That much is unsurprising, yes.

1/3 just doesn't seem to quite match up with the casualty rates/numbers observed so far. Though I suppose I am assuming the worst case outcomes for those things.

I truly cannot understand why so little is being done. Even just the economic outcomes of getting rid of /influenza/ would make it worthwhile to subsidize the measures in practically their entirety. It comes out as a net positive.

Then one considers how it would also mitigate a *lot* of other diseases and the positivity of the outcome only keeps climbing. The denial seen so far makes no sense.