Embed Notice

@saxnot in that case, where the anti-god is different from God in having no evidence for it, it's pretty easy to just say "your anti-god has no evidence so there's no reason to believe in it"
the anti-god has no evidence for it, God has evidence for Him, therefore it's prudent to believe in God and not the anti-god
and as for your last point, it's pretty easy to establish that if God exists, there are no other gods when you already believe in God, so it's moot