Embed Notice
HTML Code
Corresponding Notice
- Embed this noticeWell, for starters, your definitions of "assault" are at best suspect. I know your kind after having dealt with you for many years, and you redefine it to include "hurtful words" which is as vague as possible to include whatever you feel like taking as an attack. Ephemeral emotional states and poorly regulated biorhythms are a shitty basis for creating social norms.
Secondly, sir, you are a man in a mockery of nature, a product of the synthetic world that rejects nature with such a vicious resentment as to make any and all of your claims nothing short of demonic subversion. You argue from bad faith and expect people to take you seriously, and cry victim when we reject your claims. This is the ultimate point of your synthetic world: that victims should receive benefits and is the very reason why so many of you are communist or adjacent. "From those according to ability to those according to need" and explains neatly why so many of you try to climb the victim hierarchy. You will never achieve anything of real value by siphoning resources to feed your isolated narcissism.