Embed Notice

@tek @nyquildotorg

Yeah, it will be interesting when people cite chatgpt as a source which one cannot verify as you can't revist that source. At least with WikiPedia or other more credible sources you can put in source url, date etc and people know when you found the source

Chat gpt is hopeless. a friend found instructions to make slime, just what to do, no ingreident list or how much to use, so from a science viewpoint totally useless.