Embed Notice

@SoniEx2

I am posting this because it fits with a phenomenon I've already observed and that has been observed by multiple others, and becuase while the methodology may introduce bias, I do not see how those biases matter here.

Virtually every scientist I followed from the initial phases of COVID is on BlueSky. Virtually none are on mastodon any longer.

That is the topic. Saying that they didn't "prove their case" or arguing methodology is missing the point by about a hundred miles

I am not looking for a debate on polling methodology for informal surveys of readership conducted by Nature.

Strike 2.