I've been reading a lot about lynching recently. What's funny is that lynching is considered a Southern thing, but most lynchings in the US were in what is now the midwest until after the civil war. There were almost no lynchings in the South until after the war.

Following the war, the carpetbaggers (jews) were rigging elections and installing niggers in government in the South. The reconstruction period had thuggish federal troops patrolling the South and constantly reminding Southerners that they had a boot on their neck, and there was essentially no effective law enforcement or justice system--it was just the whim of criminal gangs, which were made up of feds, jews, niggers, and people who were just pieces of shit and knew they could get away with harming decent folks. Many of them hid behind the "legitimacy" of the federal government or local governments controlled by the feds.

There was a revolving door at the jail. Somebody would get shot, the shooter would be arrested, sign himself out of jail, disappear into a different county for a while, then come back and do it again. They weren't even having trials because the defendants didn't show up.

One of the funniest things I've read was that one anti-lynching crusader figured out that up to 1/3 of "lynching victims" were innocent of the crime for which they were lynched. And although the media these days portrays lynching as a crime by White people against niggers, it looks to me like lynching was about half and half split between niggers and White criminals.

In fact, it also appears that most "lynching victims" were well-known to be part of the "revolving door" justice system, and the lynchings didn't happen until they were well known terrorizers of the countryside, with the justice system refusing to do its job to stop them.

The "lynch mobs" were often not really mobs at all, but carefully orchestrated reprisals to stop injustices that the government was unwilling or unable to prevent, using numbers to ensure success.