Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://wandering.shop/users/xgranade/statuses/113869742149302189">Cassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️ (xgranade@wandering.shop)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Jan-2025 19:33:43 JST</a><a href="https://wandering.shop/@xgranade" title="xgranade@wandering.shop"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/114762-48-20230711182559.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Cassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Cassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️</a><div><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/8649796" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/107196" title="makdaam@chaos.social">Leszek</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/203563" title="avitus@ioc.exchange">Avitus</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mstdn.social/@rysiek">@rysiek</a> <a href="https://ioc.exchange/@Avitus">@Avitus</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/@makdaam">@makdaam</a> IIRC, 404 uses a loginwall to prevent AI scraping, for the most part. Anyway, Signal's alleged statement from the article:</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4420667#notice-8654198">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-01-22T19:33:43+09:00" title="Wednesday, 22-Jan-2025 19:33:43 JST">about 16 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://wandering.shop/@xgranade/113869742149302189" rel="external" title="Sent from wandering.shop via ActivityPub">wandering.shop</a></span></span><a href="https://wandering.shop/@xgranade/113869742149302189">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3984247">404 Media first asked Signal for comment in early December. The organization did not provide a statement in time for publication, but daniel shared their response to his bug report.“What you're describing (observing cache hits and misses) is a generic property of how Content Distribution Networks function. Signal's use of CDNs is neither unique nor alarming, and also doesn't impact Signal's end-to-end encryption. CDNs are utilized by every popular application and website on the internet, and they are essential for high-performance and reliability while serving a global audience,” Signal’s security team wrote.</a></label><br><a href="https://stockroom.wandering.shop/media_attachments/files/113/869/738/587/336/182/original/b2d4ea48a0dd6505.png" rel="external">https://stockroom.wandering.shop/media_attachments/files/113/869/738/587/336/182/original/b2d4ea48a0dd6505.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3984248">“There is already a large body of existing work that explores this topic in detail, but if someone needs to completely obscure their network location (especially at a level as coarse and imprecise as the example that appears in your video) a VPN is absolutely necessary. That functionality falls outside of Signal's scope. Signal protects the privacy of your messages and calls, but it has never attempted to fully replicate the set of network-layer anonymity features that projects like Wireguard, Tor, and other open-source VPN software can provide,” it added.</a></label><br><a href="https://stockroom.wandering.shop/media_attachments/files/113/869/741/591/392/192/original/9eb7d35462dbec9d.png" rel="external">https://stockroom.wandering.shop/media_attachments/files/113/869/741/591/392/192/original/9eb7d35462dbec9d.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Cassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️ (xgranade@wandering.shop)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Jan-2025 19:33:43 JSTCassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️
in reply to
@rysiek @Avitus @makdaam IIRC, 404 uses a loginwall to prevent AI scraping, for the most part. Anyway, Signal's alleged statement from the article:
In conversationabout 16 days ago from wandering.shoppermalink
Attachments
1. 404 Media first asked Signal for comment in early December. The organization did not provide a statement in time for publication, but daniel shared their response to his bug report. “What you're describing (observing cache hits and misses) is a generic property of how Content Distribution Networks function. Signal's use of CDNs is neither unique nor alarming, and also doesn't impact Signal's end-to-end encryption. CDNs are utilized by every popular application and website on the internet, and they are essential for high-performance and reliability while serving a global audience,” Signal’s security team wrote.
  https://stockroom.wandering.shop/media_attachments/files/113/869/738/587/336/182/original/b2d4ea48a0dd6505.png
2. “There is already a large body of existing work that explores this topic in detail, but if someone needs to completely obscure their network location (especially at a level as coarse and imprecise as the example that appears in your video) a VPN is absolutely necessary. That functionality falls outside of Signal's scope. Signal protects the privacy of your messages and calls, but it has never attempted to fully replicate the set of network-layer anonymity features that projects like Wireguard, Tor, and other open-source VPN software can provide,” it added.
  https://stockroom.wandering.shop/media_attachments/files/113/869/741/591/392/192/original/9eb7d35462dbec9d.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice