Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mas.to/users/kims/statuses/113822385391504701">Kim Scheinberg (kims@mas.to)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 03:09:32 JST</a><a href="https://mas.to/@kims" title="kims@mas.to"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/67357-48-20240730001655.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Kim Scheinberg" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Kim Scheinberg</a><div><a href="https://epistolary.org/@matildazq/113822296029157411" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://epistolary.org/@matildazq">@matildazq</a> <br>I went back and finished it and REALLY wish I hadn't. What I excerpted was in the bottom quintile of horrible. Even if 50% is lies and 80% is embellished, I think this bit says it all.</p><p>Imagine saying to your (then-ex) partner, "Not this one. She's too fragile." What are you confessing?</p><p>Maybe she's trying to prove to herself that he is redeemable, but a part of her has to know his kink is dominance and betrayal. Her ask is worse than meaningless, it's practically a dare.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4366263#notice-8541293">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-01-14T03:09:32+09:00" title="Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 03:09:32 JST">about 5 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mas.to/@kims/113822385391504701" rel="external" title="Sent from mas.to via ActivityPub">mas.to</a></span></span><a href="https://mas.to/@kims/113822385391504701">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3907013">Anaru, in whom Pavlovich had confided about Gaiman. “I'm glad she had you to take care of her,” she wrote. “It’s been a rough month for everyone.” Anaru’s partner, Kris Taylor, was a doctor of psychology who had lectured at the University of Auckland on coercion, consent, and rape. Although Pavlovich had never used the words rape or sexual assault to describe what had happened to her, both Anaru and Taylor believed Gaiman had raped her repeatedly. Anaru felt Palmer bore a share of the blame. Replying to Palmer, she wrote that “the majority of my rage is directed at Neil.” But she couldn’t understand why, with all Palmer knew about Gaiman, she had sent Scarlett into that situation. “Did you not see this coming a mile away?” She added, “And yes I know you asked him not to do that to her, but honestly, the fact you even felt that was something you should ask is fucked up in ways that defy comprehension.”</a></label><br><a href="https://media.mas.to/media_attachments/files/113/822/355/705/754/051/original/8c50173e1114d107.jpg" rel="external">https://media.mas.to/media_attachments/files/113/822/355/705/754/051/original/8c50173e1114d107.jpg</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Kim Scheinberg (kims@mas.to)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 03:09:32 JSTKim Scheinberg
in reply to
- Matilda T. Zombie Queen
@matildazq
I went back and finished it and REALLY wish I hadn't. What I excerpted was in the bottom quintile of horrible. Even if 50% is lies and 80% is embellished, I think this bit says it all.
Imagine saying to your (then-ex) partner, "Not this one. She's too fragile." What are you confessing?
Maybe she's trying to prove to herself that he is redeemable, but a part of her has to know his kink is dominance and betrayal. Her ask is worse than meaningless, it's practically a dare.
In conversationabout 5 days ago from mas.topermalink
Attachments
1. Anaru, in whom Pavlovich had confided about Gaiman. “I'm glad she had you to take care of her,” she wrote. “It’s been a rough month for everyone.” Anaru’s partner, Kris Taylor, was a doctor of psychology who had lectured at the University of Auckland on coercion, consent, and rape. Although Pavlovich had never used the words rape or sexual assault to describe what had happened to her, both Anaru and Taylor believed Gaiman had raped her repeatedly. Anaru felt Palmer bore a share of the blame. Replying to Palmer, she wrote that “the majority of my rage is directed at Neil.” But she couldn’t understand why, with all Palmer knew about Gaiman, she had sent Scarlett into that situation. “Did you not see this coming a mile away?” She added, “And yes I know you asked him not to do that to her, but honestly, the fact you even felt that was something you should ask is fucked up in ways that defy comprehension.”
  https://media.mas.to/media_attachments/files/113/822/355/705/754/051/original/8c50173e1114d107.jpg

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice