Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mstdn.social/users/older/statuses/113801012037720068">older (older@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 09:42:41 JST</a><a href="https://mstdn.social/@older" title="older@mstdn.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/116565-48-20230621224700.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="older" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">older</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@xenotar/113800957362642349" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/115243" title="arstechnica@mastodon.social">Ars Technica</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@xenotar">@xenotar</a><br>So not really comparable to 16Gb RPi. Also software support prospects are not very bright with the news like this:<br><a href="https://mastodon.social/@geerlingguy/113698847221483936" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://mastodon.social/@geerlingguy/113698847221483936</a><br><a href="https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica">@arstechnica</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4342804#notice-8495511">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-01-10T09:42:41+09:00" title="Friday, 10-Jan-2025 09:42:41 JST">Friday, 10-Jan-2025 09:42:41 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@older/113801012037720068" rel="external" title="Sent from mstdn.social via ActivityPub">mstdn.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@older/113801012037720068">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://mastodon.social/@geerlingguy/113698847221483936">Jeff Geerling (@geerlingguy@mastodon.social)</a></h5><div> from <span>Jeff Geerling</span></div></header><div>"I was told Rockchip no longer considers RK3588 to be an “open source” chip. In practice, that means Rockchip no longer contributes RK3588 code to open-source projects and they also decided not to sell RK3588 directly to SBC vendors." https://www.cnx-software.com/2024/12/21/rockchip-rk3588-mainline-linux-support-current-status-and-future-work-for-2025/This, paired with Joshua Riek stepping away from ubuntu-rockchip, doesn't bode well for RK3588's SBC futures.Maybe why Radxa is going with a different vendor for their next flagship board, the Orion 6?</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
older (older@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 10-Jan-2025 09:42:41 JSTolder
in reply to
- Xenotar
- Ars Technica
@xenotar
So not really comparable to 16Gb RPi. Also software support prospects are not very bright with the news like this:
https://mastodon.social/@geerlingguy/113698847221483936
@arstechnica
In conversationFriday, 10-Jan-2025 09:42:41 JST from mstdn.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Jeff Geerling (@geerlingguy@mastodon.social)
  from Jeff Geerling
  "I was told Rockchip no longer considers RK3588 to be an “open source” chip. In practice, that means Rockchip no longer contributes RK3588 code to open-source projects and they also decided not to sell RK3588 directly to SBC vendors." https://www.cnx-software.com/2024/12/21/rockchip-rk3588-mainline-linux-support-current-status-and-future-work-for-2025/ This, paired with Joshua Riek stepping away from ubuntu-rockchip, doesn't bode well for RK3588's SBC futures. Maybe why Radxa is going with a different vendor for their next flagship board, the Orion 6?

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice