Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/trwnh/statuses/113789109074732328">infinite love ⴳ (trwnh@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Jan-2025 06:21:13 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@trwnh" title="trwnh@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/3863-48-20231028031507.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="infinite love ⴳ" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">infinite love ⴳ</a><div><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/280231" title="puppygirlhornypost2@transfem.social">Amber</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/295917" title="cwebber@social.coop">Christine Lemmer-Webber</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://transfem.social/@puppygirlhornypost2">@puppygirlhornypost2</a> <a href="https://akko.erincandescent.net/users/erincandescent">@erincandescent</a> <a href="https://social.coop/@cwebber">@cwebber</a> actually speaking of as:subject and the entire as:Relationship model</p><p>why reinvent rdf triples? reifying a Relationship is basically exactly the same as reifying a Statement. <a href="https://www.w3.org/wiki/RdfReification" rel="nofollow">https://www.w3.org/wiki/RdfReification</a></p><p>as:subject == rdf:subject<br>as:relationship == rdf:predicate<br>as:object in this case is used equivalently to rdf:object despite not being semantically equivalent????</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4330778#notice-8466044">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-01-08T06:21:13+09:00" title="Wednesday, 08-Jan-2025 06:21:13 JST">about 10 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@trwnh/113789109074732328" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@trwnh/113789109074732328">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3862958">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
infinite love ⴳ (trwnh@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Jan-2025 06:21:13 JSTinfinite love ⴳ
@puppygirlhornypost2 @erincandescent @cwebber actually speaking of as:subject and the entire as:Relationship model
why reinvent rdf triples? reifying a Relationship is basically exactly the same as reifying a Statement. https://www.w3.org/wiki/RdfReification
as:subject == rdf:subject
as:relationship == rdf:predicate
as:object in this case is used equivalently to rdf:object despite not being semantically equivalent????
In conversationabout 10 days ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice