Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://sigmoid.social/users/cigitalgem/statuses/113742758217252029">Gary McGraw (cigitalgem@sigmoid.social)'s status on Tuesday, 31-Dec-2024 22:11:00 JST</a><a href="https://sigmoid.social/@cigitalgem" title="cigitalgem@sigmoid.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/161506-48-20240419155640.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Gary McGraw" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Gary McGraw</a></section><article><p>The only way ML models should be called "open source" is if entire training data sets and evaluation sets are public.  AI/ML code is not at all interesting.  It's the data, stupid.</p><p><a href="https://sigmoid.social/tags/MLsec" rel="tag">#MLsec</a> </p><p><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3630275/the-future-of-open-source-will-be-messy.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.infoworld.com/article/3630275/the-future-of-open-source-will-be-messy.html</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4287590#notice-8381246">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-12-31T22:11:00+09:00" title="Tuesday, 31-Dec-2024 22:11:00 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://sigmoid.social/@cigitalgem/113742758217252029" rel="external" title="Sent from sigmoid.social via ActivityPub">sigmoid.social</a></span></span><a href="https://sigmoid.social/@cigitalgem/113742758217252029">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.infoworld.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3630275/the-future-of-open-source-will-be-messy.html">The future of open source will be messy</a></h5><div></div></header><div>Meta and other leading makers of ‘open’ AI models aren’t willing to cede policing of the term ‘open source’ to the Open Source Initiative. And developers don’t seem to care.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Gary McGraw (cigitalgem@sigmoid.social)'s status on Tuesday, 31-Dec-2024 22:11:00 JST Gary McGraw
The only way ML models should be called "open source" is if entire training data sets and evaluation sets are public. AI/ML code is not at all interesting. It's the data, stupid.
#MLsec
https://www.infoworld.com/article/3630275/the-future-of-open-source-will-be-messy.html
In conversationabout 3 months ago from sigmoid.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.infoworld.com
  The future of open source will be messy
  Meta and other leading makers of ‘open’ AI models aren’t willing to cede policing of the term ‘open source’ to the Open Source Initiative. And developers don’t seem to care.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice