Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 31-Dec-2024 22:10:59 JST Rich Felker

   in reply to

   @cigitalgem Not just public, but consisting entirely of materials in the public domain or with mutually compatible, open source definition conforming licenses, and if the model honors the conditions of all those licenses.

   • Embed this notice
     Gary McGraw (cigitalgem@sigmoid.social)'s status on Tuesday, 31-Dec-2024 22:11:00 JST Gary McGraw

     The only way ML models should be called "open source" is if entire training data sets and evaluation sets are public. AI/ML code is not at all interesting. It's the data, stupid.

     #MLsec

     https://www.infoworld.com/article/3630275/the-future-of-open-source-will-be-messy.html