@georgia @snacks
> you really think your theory of what will happen when demons invade earth is much more realistic than people who want satya yuga to begin in the next couple centuries?

Yes. You live nowhere even close to the Satya Yuga. There are countless millennia of strife after this one. Conversely I am pretty sure that most ordinary people seeing a demon would say "oh fuck a demon, please somebody kill it."

>Demons are much more evil than most humans and the massive proliferation of asuras on Earth would cause irreligion and unrighteousness to flourish.

Delusional nonsense. Christians alone would be enormously galvanised. Deus Vult would become a way of life. Irreligion flourishes because people doubt the existence of the "paranormal," put a demon in their face and they will be unable to ignore it.

>I also find your constant invocation of Abrahamic religions as a gotcha to be indicative of a deeper insecurity?

Pathetic pseudopsychology. Hatred and obsession are not functions of insecurity. It's a fallacy most commonly regurgitated in the idea that hatred comes from fear, which in reality only obfuscates our grasp of hatred.

>God has spoken to many peoples, not just the Indians.

Has literally nothing to do with anything either of us said, but considering it came right after "heh are you mad about God chuddy?" this looks a lot like an "A-Abrahamism is real religion too" ploy which is honestly predictable beyond the point of hilarity.

>Have you heard of San Juan de la Cruz? He was a jivanmukti of the highest calibre, a paramahamsa. He wrote extensively about experiencing annihilation of the senses and finding lasting oneness with God.

No I haven't and this is a non-sequitur.

>But I'm done arguing. Its adharmic.

ARGUING is adharmic? HOLY COPE. I never thought I would see such an excuse in my life. (In before "i-it's a joke")