Embed Notice

@rcz @darnell I don't know, I am not the one proposing invasive testing in sports in the first place.

Gender-related testing is pretty damn invasive. Especially in very public cases like Amal's.

And I would not be surprised if gender-related testing was more often applied to people participating in female disciplines, than male.

Would you agree that is pretty likely to be the case, based on the fact that the stated purpose is safety and fairness, and men are assumed to have a benefit?