@NonPlayableClown @Zergling_man

> Im not him

Nobody said you were. I said that this is why I didn't want to have a protracted discussion about graf with him: this will happen.

> Then I change the rest of the conversation into DMs if you desire.

If I don't want to do this once and I have already done it once, I don't want to do it twice.

> Almost like he can keep control of a narrative. But I don't care what he thinks.

Your refusal to understand the feedback loop propagates the feedback loop.

1. Someone complains about graf.
2. graf has answered that complaint at least a dozen times.
3. "GRAF YOUR DECISION TO OPERATE A WEBSITE MEANS THAT YOU OWE PEOPLE THAT DO NOT USE THIS WEBSITE AN EXPLANATION"
4. graf declines to respond to the complaint.
5. "HE MUST BE HIDING SOMETHING! THIS IS THE ONLY REASON HE WOULD NOT ANSWER THESE INTERMINABLE QUESTIONS!"
6. GOTO 1

> Yeah it's a shit thing to happen.

That does not explain what agreement you made with graf that graf has failed to honor.

> was Gleason contracted to maintain soapbox?

He committed to doing so and failed to even fix bugs that he repeatedly promised to fix.

> Let me remind you then.
> [some drama with milk]

I just talked to milk. If milk has some issue, then it has since been ironed out, because milk is still on Poast.

Now, if you have trouble with this, I will repeat it: I don't care to get into it. If graf is terrible, at some point I will notice it occurring, because I'm here all the damn time and I'm not retarded. Thank you.

> Nope still going to post it.

"I don't care if you're sick of this shit, I'm going to cram it down your throat."

I wonder what makes graf impatient with people like this.

I have, repeatedly, asked what it is that graf did *before* arriving on fedi that had everyone's panties in a bunch, because the anti-graf brigade was already at it when I met him. No one has answered. I am forced to conclude that you're all feds. Thank you.