@p @Flick @817148c3690155401b494580871fb0564a5faafb9454813ef295f2706bc93359 @phnt >This is the issue. You can pick a piece out, but I talk to the guy every day. These aren't formal contracts, he's not signing a bill into law, it's a very informal conversation. So I see that and I read something that resembles all the other stuff he has said.
This sounds more like you're not actually reading his post at all, and just assuming what he has meant, regardless of what was written. Call me crazy, but I write what I mean, instead of what I don't mean, so that when people read it, they will see the thing I mean and not something else.

>Nobody wants to have a conversation that works that way, though.
I dunno I am a fan of conversing by actually reading what people write and assuming that they have meant what they have written. Probably relatedly, I do not like tsunderes.