Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/ashleygjovik/statuses/113442961274599903">Ashley M. Gjøvik, JD (ashleygjovik@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 08:35:41 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@ashleygjovik" title="ashleygjovik@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/231699-48-20240113013158.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Ashley M. Gjøvik, JD" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Ashley M. Gjøvik, JD</a></section><article><p>Right after Apple somehow Jedi-mindtricked the Judge to dismiss tons of my key claims, and for admittedly no good reason - I got a random phone call that I'm 99% sure was Apple's lawyers - pretending to be an Apple worker &amp; trying to get me to say I regret suing Apple.  That showed me they're desperate.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3959536#notice-7734788">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-08T08:35:41+09:00" title="Friday, 08-Nov-2024 08:35:41 JST">about 2 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@ashleygjovik/113442961274599903" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@ashleygjovik/113442961274599903">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3437839"> If the Ninth Circuit accepts the appeal, Gjovik intends to appeal at least the dismissals of her
claims for RICO §§ 1962(a) and 1962(d); RICO §§ 1962(c) and 1962(d); whistleblower retaliation under the
Sarbanes–Oxley and Dodd-Frank Acts; violations of the Bane Civil Rights Act and the Ralph Civil Rights
Act; Ultrahazardous Activities; Absolute Nuisance; Nuisance Per Se; Cal. Business and Professions Code
§§ 17200 et seq.; Cal. Labor Code § 6399.7 and the “Right to Know” generally; Breach of the Implied
Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; IIED with a basis of
defamation and accusations of dishonesty; retaliation for protected labor complaints about slavery,
apartheid, genocide, and “Muslim human rights”; and whistleblower protection for protected disclosures
about smuggling, violations of sanctions, violations of environmental laws, federal crimes committed in
furtherance of violations of environmental laws, racketeering, and certain privacy invasions violating the
California Constitution.</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/442/945/290/750/902/original/189bb264672bc18c.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/442/945/290/750/902/original/189bb264672bc18c.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Ashley M. Gjøvik, JD (ashleygjovik@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 08:35:41 JST Ashley M. Gjøvik, JD
Right after Apple somehow Jedi-mindtricked the Judge to dismiss tons of my key claims, and for admittedly no good reason - I got a random phone call that I'm 99% sure was Apple's lawyers - pretending to be an Apple worker & trying to get me to say I regret suing Apple. That showed me they're desperate.
In conversationabout 2 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. If the Ninth Circuit accepts the appeal, Gjovik intends to appeal at least the dismissals of her claims for RICO §§ 1962(a) and 1962(d); RICO §§ 1962(c) and 1962(d); whistleblower retaliation under the Sarbanes–Oxley and Dodd-Frank Acts; violations of the Bane Civil Rights Act and the Ralph Civil Rights Act; Ultrahazardous Activities; Absolute Nuisance; Nuisance Per Se; Cal. Business and Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq.; Cal. Labor Code § 6399.7 and the “Right to Know” generally; Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; IIED with a basis of defamation and accusations of dishonesty; retaliation for protected labor complaints about slavery, apartheid, genocide, and “Muslim human rights”; and whistleblower protection for protected disclosures about smuggling, violations of sanctions, violations of environmental laws, federal crimes committed in furtherance of violations of environmental laws, racketeering, and certain privacy invasions violating the California Constitution.
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/442/945/290/750/902/original/189bb264672bc18c.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice