• Public

  • Public
  • Network
  • Groups
  • Featured
  • Popular
  • People

If the Ninth Circuit accepts the appeal, Gjovik intends to appeal at least the dismissals of her claims for RICO §§ 1962(a) and 1962(d); RICO §§ 1962(c) and 1962(d); whistleblower retaliation under the Sarbanes–Oxley and Dodd-Frank Acts; violations of the Bane Civil Rights Act and the Ralph Civil Rights Act; Ultrahazardous Activities; Absolute Nuisance; Nuisance Per Se; Cal. Business and Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq.; Cal. Labor Code § 6399.7 and the “Right to Know” generally; Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; IIED with a basis of defamation and accusations of dishonesty; retaliation for protected labor complaints about slavery, apartheid, genocide, and “Muslim human rights”; and whistleblower protection for protected disclosures about smuggling, violations of sanctions, violations of environmental laws, federal crimes committed in furtherance of violations of environmental laws, racketeering, and certain privacy invasions violating the California Constitution.